Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 8K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
MiniMax M1 and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 1000K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
MiniMax M1 is made by minimax while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. MiniMax M1 has a 1000K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
MiniMax M1 wins input (1.7× cheaper)·PaLM 2 Chat wins output (3.3× cheaper)
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 3.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji
Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 8K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
MiniMax M1 and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 1000K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
MiniMax M1 is made by minimax while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. MiniMax M1 has a 1000K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
MiniMax M1 wins input (1.7× cheaper)·PaLM 2 Chat wins output (3.3× cheaper)
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 3.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji