MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M1
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.65
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
2.7× cheaper
Output
$0.60
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
65%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 5.2x more emoji
MiniMax M1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
53%Vocabulary56%
17wSentence Length14w
0.51Hedging0.37
7.4Bold5.7
6.2Lists4.0
0.10Emoji0.54
0.86Headings0.70
0.03Transitions0.14
Based on 14 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
