What is the difference between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4 cost compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is $14.89/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jul 2025

Claude Opus 4vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at $0.11/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Opus 4	Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.11/M tokens
Output price	$75/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	131K tokens
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	May 2025	Jul 2025