MiniMax M1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, in 1 community votes, qwen: qwen3.5 397b a17b wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 26 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, MiniMax M1 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 1000K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between MiniMax M1 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

MiniMax M1 is made by minimax while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. MiniMax M1 has a 1000K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1Runner-up

Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. In 1 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 5.3x more transitions

MiniMax M1
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
53%Vocabulary54%
17wSentence Length14w
0.51Hedging0.39
7.4Bold6.9
6.2Lists4.2
0.10Emoji0.23
0.86Headings0.93
0.03Transitions0.17
Based on 14 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

MiniMax M1Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions