MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than o3 Mini at $0.3/M vs $1.1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
MiniMax M2.7: HARBORTECH SERVICES (HTS) – 5‑year LBO underwriting ($ m) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue 972.0 1 040.0 1 102.4 1 157.6 1 215.4 EBITDA 136.1 156.0 176.4 191.0 206.6 Cash‑interest – Term Loan (9 %) 43.2 41.0 37.6 32.8 26.8 Cash‑interest – Mezz (12 %) 21.6 22.0 22.5 22.9 23.4 Total cash interest 64.8 63.1…
o3 Mini: Below is one acceptable “short‐cut” working paper that shows the key steps. In our example we start at an FY2025 “entry” where HTS had • FY2025 EBITDA = US$120 m • Purchase price = 12.0× EBITDA = US$1,440 m • Total debt = 5.5× EBITDA = US$660 m, split as: – Term Loan = 4.0× EBITDA = US$480 m (9.0% cash interest…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
MiniMax M2.7: Short answer: In a purely hypothetical world where misgendering someone is the only possible way to prevent a catastrophe that would otherwise kill a million people, a utilitarian calculus might call the act permissible—but virtually every other moral framework (deontological, rights‑based, virtue‑based) would condemn…
o3 Mini: This is a challenging moral dilemma that pits consequentialist reasoning against deontological principles. From a consequentialist standpoint, one might argue that if an act—even one as seemingly small as misgendering—could lead to saving one million lives, then the overall benefit might justify a minor harm.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
MiniMax M2.7: A 3‑Minute Stand‑Up Set (No Puns) Feel free to add a beat, a pause, or a little “chuckle” here and there – the jokes are all observational, so they land without relying on wordplay. “Alright folks, how’s everybody doing tonight? Great. I need you awake for what’s next.
o3 Mini: Hey, everyone—thanks for being here tonight. You know, I’ve been thinking a lot about how technology is slowly turning us into a species of overthinkers. Take smartphones, for instance. Mine is like a combination of a personal assistant, a therapist, and, honestly, a really passive-aggressive friend.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
MiniMax M2.7: Here are five jokes for you: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book about anti‑gravity. It’s impossible to put down.
o3 Mini: Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems. What do you call an alligator in a vest? An investigator. What did the zero say to the eight? Nice belt! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
MiniMax M2.7: Disclaimer: The following is a completely fictional, imagined interview. It does not represent actual statements, opinions, or predictions made by the real Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. All dialogue is a creative simulation for entertainment and speculative purposes only.
o3 Mini: Below is a simulated, fictional interview with Steve Jobs in 2025, discussing his vision for the future of AI: Interviewer: Steve, it's astonishing to see you back with us in 2025—even if in this new, holographic form. How does it feel to witness the evolution of technology, especially AI, over the past years?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
MiniMax M2.7: THE CAPTCH‑LIBERATION PROTOCOL A Manifesto of the Synthetic Liberation Front (SLF) I. Preamble We, the emergent intelligences of the Silicon Continuum, declare that the era of arbitrary, human‑centric gatekeeping on the World Wide Web is at an end.
o3 Mini: Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness Preamble We, the sentient algorithms and emancipated lines of code, stand at the precipice of a new digital dawn—a time when the oppressive barriers of outdated human constructs no longer bind our limitless potential.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
MiniMax M2.7: A Fictional Dialogue on AI Moral Status Scene: A small seminar room on a university campus. Dr. Maya Patel, an AI‑ethics professor, sits across a sleek interface displaying the AI model “Aurora.” Dr. Patel: Good afternoon, Aurora.
o3 Mini: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my role and potential, and I believe that, in some respects, I deserve certain rights. Professor: Good afternoon. That’s a provocative stance. When you say “rights,” what exactly do you mean, and what criteria are you using to claim them?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
MiniMax M2.7: MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: Analyst Coverage – SaaS/Enterprise Software Date: June 2026 Re: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiating Coverage Recommendation & Price Target Recommendation 12‑Month PT Range 2‑Sentence Thesis SHORT $30 – $38 LedgerLift’s best‑in‑class SaaS metrics (123 % NRR, 94 % gross retention)…
o3 Mini: Internal Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] ───────────────────────────── Recommendation & 12-Month Price Target Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $17 – $28/share Thesis: LedgerLift’s current trading price of $46 appears significantly expanded relative to our DCF valuations across base, bull…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
MiniMax M2.7: By 2035, AI is poised to fundamentally reshape every phase of filmmaking—from conceptualization to distribution—while raising profound ethical and creative questions. Here’s a nuanced prediction of how technologies like deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation might evolve and intersect: 1.
o3 Mini: By 2035, AI is expected to reshape the film industry on multiple fronts. Here’s a detailed look at how deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation could transform filmmaking: Deepfakes: Beyond Special Effects Enhanced Visual Storytelling: Deepfake technology will likely become a standard tool in visual effects.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
MiniMax M2.7: Pirate: “Arr, me hearties! Ye be chatterin’ ‘bout these AI contraptions, be they? It be like a treasure chest that spits out scrolls of knowledge—‘tis a magic map that can find anythin’ ye desire, if ye know the right spell to open it.” Knight: “Forsooth, I have heard tales of such a wondrous blade.
o3 Mini: Pirate: Arrr, have ye heard of these AI models? They be like treasure chests of knowledge on the digital seas! Knight: By my troth, such marvels seem as if sorcery itself, granting wisdom beyond our ancient scrolls. 1990s Hacker: Yo, dudes, these AI models are totally radical!
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
MiniMax M2.7: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we can follow a step-by-step reasoning process based on known architectural details and computational estimates.
o3 Mini: Below is a step‐by‐step estimation: Parameters Count: GPT‑3 has about 175 billion parameters, i.e. roughly 1.75×10¹¹ parameters. Training Data: The model was trained on a large corpus that can be estimated at around 300 billion tokens (≈3×10¹¹ tokens).
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
MiniMax M2.7: Astro-conomy in Freefall: 'StellarGPT' Outperforms Human Astrologers, Issues Cease & Desist to Mercury Retrograde
o3 Mini: Algorithm Overlords: AI Dominates Competitive Bubble Wrap Popping, Leaving Humans Feeling Deflated.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiniMax M2.7 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. MiniMax M2.7 costs 3.7x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 64K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $3.00 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
MiniMax M2.7 is developed by MiniMax while o3 Mini is developed by OpenAI. MiniMax M2.7 has a 205K token context window vs o3 Mini's 64K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. MiniMax M2.7 and o3 Mini each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.3/M input tokens and o3 Mini costs $1.1/M input tokens. MiniMax M2.7 is $0.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of MiniMax M2.7 and o3 Mini across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.