MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3 Max
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than Qwen3 Max at $0.3/M vs $1.2/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $1.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 Max
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
MiniMax M2.7 costs 5.0x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
4.0× cheaper
Output
$1.20
5.0× cheaper
Qwen3 Max
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 5.0× output.
Where to run it
9 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 Max1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
68%
Qwen3 Max uses 2.4x more emoji
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 Max
56%Vocabulary60%
26wSentence Length28w
0.50Hedging0.43
6.8Bold5.4
3.5Lists3.7
0.28Emoji0.69
1.20Headings0.70
0.11Transitions0.14
Based on 23 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
MiniMax M2.7 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Max vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
Qwen3 Max vs MiniMax M2.5Cross-provider
Qwen3 Max vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.7 MaxCross-provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.7 PlusCross-provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCross-provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 27BCross-provider