Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Updated Jun 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

32 prompts
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNemotron 3.5 Content Safety

User Safety: safe

User Safety: safe

Aviation safety

United States. General Accounting Office

User Safety: safe

Memory-Safe

Puzzle

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.5 397B A17B

Inception

2010

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus

Mary Shelley

Tokyo

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 62 shared prompts
SpecNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input priceFree$0.6/M tokens
Output priceFree$3.6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedJun 2026Feb 2026
At 10M a month$0$0$6.00$6.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it11 hosts, cheapest first
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NVIDIADegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 13 Oct 2026$0 in·$0 out·128k·99.6% up
Qwen3.5 397B A17B10 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.39 in·$2.34 out·262k·99.9% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.45 in·$3.00 out·262k·99.4% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.50 in·$3.60 out·262k·100% up
  • PPhala$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.7% up
  • NNovita$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·100% up
  • SStreamLake$0.60 in·$3.60 out·256k·97.3% up
4 more hostsFewer hosts
  • VVenice$0.75 in·$4.50 out·128k·93.9% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 13 Oct 2026$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·82.1% up
  • DDigitalOceanDegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 13 Oct 2026$0.55 in·$3.50 out·131k·91.2% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 13 Oct 2026$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·89.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is developed by NVIDIA while Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 62 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 62 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $0.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same lab
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Version compare
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5 TurboNew provider
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.1New provider
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.2New provider
  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3New provider

Model pages

  • Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety67 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B66 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed