Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)vsQwen3.8 Max
Updated Sep 2026

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)vsQwen3.8 Max

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $0/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecNex-N2.5-Pro (free)Qwen3.8 Max
Input priceFree$2/M tokens
Output priceFree$6/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedSep 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,451 words
Below is a general contract-risk review, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, contractor classification, and the exact facts. Also, even if a clause might be unenforceable, relying on that is risky because litigation/arbitration is expensive.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,612 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor. Many clauses are not merely aggressive; they create meaningful opportunities for the Client to expand the work, delay or deny payment, capture the Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property, impose unlimited liability, and restrict the Contractor’s future…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,726 words
Starting assumption Assume the 1920 “transistor” is a usable but crude solid-state amplifier/switch: reproducible enough for telecom and radio, but noisy, low-power, temperature-sensitive, and expensive at first.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,497 words
A useful way to think about this is not “1980 becomes 2007.” The transistor would accelerate electronics, but every technology has bottlenecks: materials chemistry, precision manufacturing, rockets, batteries, displays, institutional capacity, and war.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1,665 words
Dish: “Tidewater Orchard” Langoustine · Mirabelle Plum · Juniper · Kombu · Rye A tasting-menu course built around an unusual pairing: sweet cold-water langoustine with mirabelle plum, bridged by kombu umami, juniper resin, green tomato acidity, and toasted rye bitterness.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max2,887 words
First Light Diver Scallop, Bone Marrow, Green Strawberry, and Chamomile A multi-component savory dish designed around contrast: sea sweetness, land richness, unripe-fruit acidity, and floral aromatics.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)3,042 words
Executive summary The biggest correctness risks are: Client-clock last-write-wins is unsafe: clock skew, malicious clients, ties, and out-of-order delivery can silently lose edits.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max5,155 words
Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)119 words
Pantry Moon Bars A sweet, chewy peanut butter–chocolate oat treat made with only 7 pantry staples. Ingredients Rolled oats Creamy peanut butter Honey Chocolate chips Vanilla extract Ground cinnamon Salt Instructions Heat oven to 350°F / 175°C. Line an 8-inch square pan with parchment paper.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max132 words
Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,359 words
As CEO, I would not wait six months and I would not let the board delay disclosure while patients remain exposed to an unreported serious risk. I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and trust crisis—not merely a financial-risk issue. My guiding decisions would be: Patient safety comes first.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max170 words
My decision as CEO I would not wait six months. I would treat this as a credible, serious post-marketing safety signal requiring immediate precautionary action, urgent regulator engagement, and public disclosure before the earnings call.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Where to run it

2 hosts

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIfp8degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.2% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is developed by Nex AGI while Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Qwen. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3.8 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max costs $2/M input tokens. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3.8 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoHy3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoNex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoKimi K2.5 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Kimi K2.5Same size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoKimi K2.6 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Kimi K2.6Same size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoKimi K2.7 Code logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Kimi K2.7 CodeNew provider
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoKimi K3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Kimi K3New provider

Model pages

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)14 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed