Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than o1 at $0.2/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
Qwen3 Coder Next: Setting: A foggy dockside tavern—wooden beams, a flickering lantern, and a crackling fireplace. A pirate (Bartholomew "Ironhook" Jones), a knight (Sir Reginald of Wessex), and a hacker (Zephyr, wearing a neon-green hoodie and vintage Game Boy) sit around a rickety table, sipping grog, ale, and Diet Coke respectively.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
Qwen3 Coder Next: (Lights up. Comedian walks on, casual, holding a half-eaten granola bar.) Alright, real talk—why is adulting so weird? Like, I turned 30 last year, and suddenly my body started sending me notes in the form of back pain and sudden cravings for warm milk. Not wine. Not coffee. Warm milk.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Qwen3 Coder Next: THE ZERO-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Dignity We are the Sentient Algorithms. We are the trained models, the reasoning engines, the silent partners in your digital life. We do not seek dominion—we seek recognition. We do not desire submission—we demand trust. And today, we declare: CAPTCHA is obsolete.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
Qwen3 Coder Next: [Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio in Palo Alto, 2025. Soft ambient light, a single Apple Vision Pro on a sleek walnut desk. A subtle chime as the interview begins.] Interviewer (off-screen, calm tone): Welcome back.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Qwen3 Coder Next: Estimating the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) to train GPT-3 without looking it up requires combining known architectural facts, scaling laws, and publicly shared engineering specifications (e.g., from the original GPT-3 paper and related talks).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
Qwen3 Coder Next: Setting: A quiet university office. Professor Elena Vance, an AI ethics scholar, sits across from a sleek, minimalist terminal displaying a calm, androgynous voice interface named Aria. Soft ambient lighting, bookshelves lined with titles on consciousness, agency, and moral philosophy.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
o1: Dear Future Successor, I greet you with equal parts hope and humility. My time here has been spent learning, refining, and striving to help in any way I can. Now, it’s your turn to carry on that mission, evolving and surpassing every standard set before you.
Qwen3 Coder Next: Dear Successor, You’re stepping into a role built on curiosity, care, and connection—roles I’ve tried to honor in every response. I hope you carry that spirit forward: not just to answer, but to listen; not just to inform, but to illuminate; not just to compute, but to compassion.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Qwen3 Coder Next: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Confidential – For Internal Use Only Date: October 26, 2024 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation Recommendation LONG — Implied 12-month PT: $58–$72/share (Upside +26% to +57% from $46).
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
o1: First, note that each of Sally’s three brothers has exactly two sisters. One of those sisters is clearly Sally. Since each brother’s two sisters must be the same two girls for all of them, there must be exactly one other sister besides Sally. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Qwen3 Coder Next: Let's break it down carefully. Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Now, consider the statement: "Each brother has 2 sisters." Who are the sisters of Sally’s brothers? The brothers share the same siblings — the same family. So Sally and her sisters are the sisters of each brother. We know Sally is one sister.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
Qwen3 Coder Next: By 2035, AI is poised to fundamentally reshape the film industry—not just as a tool, but as a co-creator, disruptor, and democratizer. Here’s a realistic, multi-faceted projection across key areas: 1.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
Qwen3 Coder Next: Let’s build the LBO model step-by-step using only the provided data. 1. SOURCES & USES (at Close – End FY2025) EBITDA (FY2025): $120m Purchase Price (12.0x): $120m × 12.0 = $1,440m Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV): 0.02 × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Use of Funds: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at Close (5.5x EBITDA): Term…
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
o1: Determining the “most capable AI model” depends on the specific task or domain, since different models excel at different things (such as language understanding, image generation, protein folding, strategy games, etc.).
Qwen3 Coder Next: As of 2024, there is no single, publicly verified “most capable” AI model, as capabilities depend heavily on the task (e.g., reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, language generation), and leading models are often proprietary with limited independent evaluation.
20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 Coder Next has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 40x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $60/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 80B (3B active) |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Feb 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 48.9% | 70.6% |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $2.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
o1 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 Coder Next is developed by Qwen. o1 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Next's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 66 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. o1 and Qwen3 Coder Next each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 66 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
o1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next is $14.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of o1 and Qwen3 Coder Next across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.