What is the difference between o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

o1 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. o1 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, o1 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does o1 cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

o1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $14.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

o1 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. o1 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, o1 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does o1 cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

o1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $14.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

o1vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than o1 at $0.4/M vs $15/M input tokens.

o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	o1	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$60/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Dec 2024	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	48.9%	72.0%

Our Verdict

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

o1Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 122B A10B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 19x less per token.

Too close to call

What do o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Input

$15.00

Output

$60.00

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

38× cheaper

Output

$3.20

19× cheaper

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 38× input, 19× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

39%

Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 10.4x more emoji

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

64%Vocabulary49%

16wSentence Length15w

0.76Hedging0.29

5.0Bold6.2

2.6Lists4.8

0.00Emoji0.10

0.44Headings0.88

0.40Transitions0.20

Based on 13 + 24 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

o1 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

o1 vs MiniMax M3New provider

o1 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

o1 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider

o1 vs GPT-5.4Same lab

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5.4 MiniCross-provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5.4 NanoCross-provider

o1 vs GPT-5.4 ProSame lab

Updated Feb 2026

o1vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than o1 at $0.4/M vs $15/M input tokens.

o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	o1	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$60/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Dec 2024	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	48.9%	72.0%

Our Verdict

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

o1Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 122B A10B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 19x less per token.

Too close to call

What do o1 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Input

$15.00

Output

$60.00

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

38× cheaper

Output

$3.20

19× cheaper

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 38× input, 19× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

39%

Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 10.4x more emoji

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

64%Vocabulary49%

16wSentence Length15w

0.76Hedging0.29

5.0Bold6.2

2.6Lists4.8

0.00Emoji0.10

0.44Headings0.88

0.40Transitions0.20

Based on 13 + 24 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

o1 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

o1 vs MiniMax M3New provider

o1 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

o1 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider

o1 vs GPT-5.4Same lab

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5.4 MiniCross-provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5.4 NanoCross-provider

o1 vs GPT-5.4 ProSame lab