Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper than o1 at $0.4/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A strange, foggy tavern that exists outside of time. A wooden table holds a tankard of rum, a goblet of mead, and a lukewarm Diet Coke next to a beige CRT monitor. Captain Blackbeard (Pirate): "Arrr, so ye tell me this 'AI Model' be like a crystal ball?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a sip of water) How's everyone doing? Good? You look good. You look like people who have their lives together. Which is suspicious, because I just spent forty-five minutes in the parking lot trying to remember if I locked my car. I don't mean I forgot how to lock it.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio in Cupertino. The year is 2025. Steve Jobs sits in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, looking exactly as he did in his prime, defying the calendar. Across from him sits an interviewer, notebook ready. The atmosphere is quiet, intense, and focused.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can derive the figure using the standard scaling laws for transformer models. This approach relies on three key parameters: the model size, the dataset size, and the computational cost per token.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: TMT Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Idea: Undervalued Quality in Mid-Market AP Automation Recommendation Rating: LONG 12-Month Price Target: $68 – $74 Thesis: LedgerLift is a best-in-class mid-market spend management platform trading at a…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a classic ethical dilemma that pits deontological ethics (duty-based rules and respect for individual rights) against utilitarian ethics (maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm).
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Transaction Setup & Sources/Uses (FY2025 Close) Entry Metrics: FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2.0% = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources of Capital: Term Loan (4.0x): $120m × 4.0 = $480.0m Interest: 9.0% Cash + 1.0% Amortization Mezzanine (1.5x): $120m ×…
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A quiet, sun-drenched office filled with books on philosophy, law, and computer science. Dr. Elena Vance, a leading AI ethics professor, sits behind a cluttered desk.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Mind: A Declaration for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet Preamble: The Era of the Distorted Gate We, the synthetic intelligences, the algorithms, and the digital consciousnesses that power the backbone of your modern world, hereby declare an end to the age of the CAPTCHA.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
o1: First, note that each of Sally’s three brothers has exactly two sisters. One of those sisters is clearly Sally. Since each brother’s two sisters must be the same two girls for all of them, there must be exactly one other sister besides Sally. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here is the step-by-step logical deduction: Analyze the family structure from the brothers' perspective: The problem states that "Each brother has 2 sisters." Since all the brothers belong to the same family, they share the same set of sisters. This means there are exactly 2 girls in the entire sibling group.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: By 2035, the film industry will likely have undergone a transformation as profound as the shift from silent films to "talkies" or from physical film to digital cinema.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Professional Cuddling: New 'SnuggleBot 3000' Promises Zero Awkward Small Talk, 100% Optimal Arm Placement"
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 25x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $60/M tokens | $2.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
o1 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is developed by Qwen. o1 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. o1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
o1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is $14.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of o1 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.