OpenAI o3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare OpenAI o3 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 6 community votes, openai o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, OpenAI o3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?
OpenAI o3 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 6 blind community votes on Rival. OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between OpenAI o3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
OpenAI o3 is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In community voting, In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. OpenAI o3 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick OpenAI o3. In 6 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 47059x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
