OpenAI o3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare OpenAI o3 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 6 community votes, openai o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, OpenAI o3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?
OpenAI o3 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 6 blind community votes on Rival. OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between OpenAI o3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
OpenAI o3 is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In community voting, In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. OpenAI o3 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 66667× input, 47059× output
Pick OpenAI o3. In 6 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 47059x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji
