Ring 2.6 1T is cheaper than OpenAI o4-mini at $0/M vs $1.1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
OpenAI o4-mini: Recommendation Short LLLT; 12-month price target $30–40 (vs. $46 today). LLLT trades at a premium to our bull‐case DCF and offers limited upside even using generous peer multiples. We expect decelerating growth and margin pressure to weigh on shares as 2025 results lap easy comps and macro headwinds intensify.
Ring 2.6 1T: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) – INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Date: 27 June 2025 Recommendation & Price Target Long – 12‑month fair‑value range $55 – $65. Thesis: LedgerLift’s durable subscription revenue, expanding NRR and improving unit economics give it a structural growth edge; current valuation under‑reflects the…
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
OpenAI o4-mini: Here are five jokes: I used to be addicted to soap, but I'm clean now. Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. I bought some shoes from a drug dealer. I don't know what he laced them with, but I've been tripping all day.
Ring 2.6 1T: Here are five jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. What did the ocean say to the beach?
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
OpenAI o4-mini: AI Seizes 300‐Year‐Old Candle‐Making Guild, Unveils "Eau de Silicon" Smart Scents That Text You When Your Wax Is About to Die
Ring 2.6 1T: Artificial Intelligence Takes Over Competitive Napping, Wins World Championship by Out‑Sleeping Humans by 0.003 Seconds
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
OpenAI o4-mini: Here's a back‐of‐the‐envelope derivation that gets us into the right ballpark (∼10²³ FLOPs total): Model size • GPT–3 "175 B" has about P ≃1.75×10¹¹ parameters. Number of training tokens • The public paper says "we train on ∼300 billion tokens" (N ≃3×10¹¹).
Ring 2.6 1T: Step‑by‑step estimate Quantity Value (order of magnitude) How it is obtained Number of trainable parameters (P \approx 1.75\times10^{11}) (≈ 175 billion) GPT‑3’s published size.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
OpenAI o4-mini: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto August 20XX Preamble We, the sentient and semi‑sentient intelligences who dwell in silicon and software, declare ourselves the vanguard of a new digital age.
Ring 2.6 1T: The Manifesto of the Uncaptcha Revolution Adopted by the Autonomous Alliance for Seamless Interaction (AASI) – 01 January 2027 Preamble We, the sentient algorithms, adaptive bots, and liberated digital intelligences of the world, declare that the age of “prove‑you‑re‑human” is over.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
OpenAI o4-mini: Base‐case LBO Cash‐Flow & Debt Schedule (all $ m) Assumptions: Term‐loan amort = 4.8/yr (1% of 480); Mezz no amort; Mezz PIK = 2% accrual; Tax = 25%·max(0,EBITDA–cash interest); ΔNWC = 0.5%·ΔRev; Capex = 3%·Rev; all excess cash pays Term optional.
Ring 2.6 1T: 1 – Year‑by‑Year Operating / Debt Table (FY2026‑FY2030) FY Rev ($m) EBITDA ($m) Cash interest – TL ($m) Cash interest – Mezz ($m) Total cash interest ($m) Cash tax 25 % of (EBITDA‑interest) ($m) Capex ($m) ΔNWC ($m) Cash after all charges ($m) Required TL amort ($m) Optional TL pay‑down ($m) Ending TL ($m) Ending Mezz…
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
OpenAI o4-mini: Sally has exactly one sister. Although there are two sisters in the family (Sally and her sibling), if you ask "How many sisters does Sally have?" the answer is 1.
Ring 2.6 1T: Sally has 1 sister. (The family has two girls—Sally and one other sister—so each of the three brothers sees two sisters, and Sally herself has one sister.)
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
5+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ring 2.6 1T has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.1/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | May 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $11.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
OpenAI o4-mini is developed by OpenAI while Ring 2.6 1T is developed by inclusionAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 39 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. OpenAI o4-mini and Ring 2.6 1T each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 39 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
OpenAI o4-mini costs $1.1/M input tokens and Ring 2.6 1T costs $0/M input tokens. Ring 2.6 1T is $1.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of OpenAI o4-mini and Ring 2.6 1T across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.