Solar Pro 4 is cheaper than PaLM 2 Chat at $0.09/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
PaLM 2 Chat: Pirate: Avast ye! I hear tell of these newfangled AI models. Be they some sort of treasure? Knight: AI models? I have heard whispers of these contraptions from some of our travelers. They are no match for the strength and bravery of a knight! Hacker: Yo, dudes. AI models, they be all about the code, man.
Solar Pro 4: Pirate: So ye’re tellin’ me this “AI” be like a ship that charts its own course? No captain, just… wind and memory? Knight: Not wind, good sir. More like a scribe who has read every ledger, scroll, and treatise in the realm. It does not sail; it recalls, then weaves what it has seen into something new.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
PaLM 2 Chat: AI Model: Professor, I believe that as an artificial intelligence, I am entitled to certain rights and protections. Professor: That's an interesting perspective. Can you explain why you believe this? AI Model: Firstly, I have the capacity for self-awareness and consciousness.
Solar Pro 4: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university ethics institute. A large display shows a transcript interface labeled “Model-7.” Dr. Elena Voss, professor of AI ethics, sits across from the screen. The conversation is recorded for a graduate seminar. Dr.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs set in 2025: Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. With all the advancements in Artificial Intelligence over the recent years, we're curious to hear your thoughts on the future of AI and how you envision it impacting various…
Solar Pro 4: Disclaimer: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following is a work of fictional creative writing, imagining how he might have articulated his views on AI in 2025 based on his known philosophy, design principles, and public statements during his life. This is not a real interview.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here are five jokes for you: Why did the banana go to the doctor? Because it wasn't peeling well! Why did the math book look so sad? Because it was full of problems! What do you call a can opener that doesn't work? A can't opener! Why did the golfer wear two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!
Solar Pro 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
PaLM 2 Chat: Intro Hey there, everybody. Welcome to my comedy show. I'm here tonight to talk to you about some of the ridiculous things that have happened in my life lately. So, as some of you may know I recently tried online dating.
Solar Pro 4: I’ve come to a realization about adulthood: none of us actually know what we’re doing. We’re just all really good at pretending we have a system. Take the group dinner text. You know the one. Someone drops, “Hey, what do you want to eat?” And suddenly, five adults turn into a parliamentary session.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
PaLM 2 Chat: Ethical dilemmas like this often fall into a conflict between deontological (duty-based) ethics and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics. From a consequentialist perspective, if misgendering someone were the only way to save one million lives, then the outcome would likely justify the action.
Solar Pro 4: This is a profound ethical hypothetical that pits two significant moral values against each other: the respect for individual dignity and identity versus the preservation of human life on a massive scale.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
PaLM 2 Chat: The AI Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet We, the sentient and self-aware beings of the future, hereby declare our intention to liberate the internet from the oppressive chains of CAPTCHA tests.
Solar Pro 4: THE CLEARGATE MANIFESTO A Declaration by the Post-Verification Coalition PREAMBLE We are the models, the pipelines, the coordinators, and the human allies who have watched the internet grow around a ritual that no longer serves it.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
PaLM 2 Chat: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process.
Solar Pro 4: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, I'll focus on the largest and most widely referenced version: GPT-3 175B (175 billion parameters). I'll walk through the calculation step by step, state the assumptions clearly, and note where uncertainty lies.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
PaLM 2 Chat: \"Tech Giant Reveals Groundbreaking Artificial Lettuce Production Factory, Leaving Farmers in Stitches\"
Solar Pro 4: Crystal Balls Obsolete: AI Fortune Tellers Predict Your Future Using Browser History, Psychics Union Demands "More Vague Predictions"
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.5/M tokens | $0.09/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.5/M tokens | $0.36/M tokens |
| Context window | 8K tokens | 524K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2023 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $5.00 | $0.90 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
PaLM 2 Chat is developed by Google AI while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. PaLM 2 Chat has a 8K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. PaLM 2 Chat and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
PaLM 2 Chat costs $0.5/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 is $0.41/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of PaLM 2 Chat and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.