Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GPT-4.1 Nano
Compare Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen against GPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) or GPT-4.1 Nano?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and GPT-4.1 Nano are both competitive models. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for GPT-4.1 Nano. Context windows: 1000K vs 1048K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and GPT-4.1 Nano
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is made by qwen while GPT-4.1 Nano is from openai. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has a 1000K token context window compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 1048K. On pricing, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for GPT-4.1 Nano.
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
GPT-4.1 Nano is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
