Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
11× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 11× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 3.9x more transitions
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
56%Vocabulary61%
14wSentence Length15w
0.37Hedging0.23
5.7Bold5.2
4.0Lists3.9
0.54Emoji1.37
0.70Headings1.22
0.14Transitions0.04
Based on 22 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
