Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
18× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.8 Max
56%Vocabulary48%
14wSentence Length17w
0.37Hedging0.95
5.7Bold4.3
4.0Lists8.2
0.54Emoji0.00
0.70Headings1.92
0.14Transitions0.02
Based on 22 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
