Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
18× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
56%Vocabulary48%
14wSentence Length17w
0.37Hedging0.95
5.7Bold4.3
4.0Lists8.2
0.54Emoji0.00
0.70Headings1.92
0.14Transitions0.02
Based on 22 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
