Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 66K, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 262K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is from qwen. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's 66K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 2.3x more transitions
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
