Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 262K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 2.5x more hedging
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
