Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 8.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
5.6× cheaper
Output
$0.28
8.4× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.40
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.6× input, 8.4× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 6.8x more emoji
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
54%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length18w
0.12Hedging0.51
7.5Bold5.3
4.2Lists2.9
0.68Emoji0.10
0.93Headings0.75
0.12Transitions0.09
Based on 16 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
