Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 Coder FlashvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3 Coder FlashvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.3/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Qwen3 Coder Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price$0.3/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$1.5/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Qwen3 Coder Flash1,258 words
3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Supplement Stack - Week 1-4 Core Foundation Supplements NAD+ Precursors: Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) 500mg, Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) 250mg - morning with breakfast Omega-3 EPA/DHA: 3g daily (1000mg each) - evening with meal Vitamin D3…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1,779 words
12-Week “Longevity + Performance” Biohacker Protocol Goal: improve healthspan markers, metabolic flexibility, strength, VO₂max, sleep, stress resilience, and cognitive output over 3 months. Important: This is an educational, high-level biohacking framework—not medical advice. It is not appropriate for everyone.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Qwen3 Coder Flash387 words
1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Ending Debt (TL + Mezz) FY2026 $972M $138M $10.8M (TL) + $1.8M (Mezz) = $12.6M $29.3M $29.2M $4.9M $48.3M $495M FY2027 $1,041M $159M $10.8M (TL) + $1.8M (Mezz) = $12.6M $31.8M $31.2M $5.2M…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B892 words
Entry capitalization All figures in $m unless noted. FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0 Entry EV = 12.0x × $120.0 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0 = $28.8 Term Loan = 4.0x × $120.0 = $480.0 Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120.0 = $180.0 Equity = EV + fees – debt = $1,440.0 + $28.8 – $660.0 = $808.8 Sources & Uses Uses $m Sources…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3 Coder Flash888 words
The Transistor Revolution of 1920: A Timeline of Consequences World War II: The Quantum Shift Military Advantage and Strategic Miscalculations If transistors existed in 1920, the Axis powers would have gained an immediate technological edge in communications, radar, and cryptography.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B4,865 words
Premise: what changes, and what does not Assume the transistor is invented in 1920 in a form roughly comparable to the late-1940s germanium point-contact or early junction transistor: it can amplify, detect, and switch signals, but it is initially expensive, low-yield, low-power, and limited in frequency.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3 Coder Flash352 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck: "94% accuracy" without context and validation Why it's weak: No benchmark comparison against existing alternatives (e.g., predictive text, voice recognition, or other BCI devices) No specificity about what constitutes "accuracy" (word-level vs.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1,709 words
The three weakest claims are the ones most likely to collapse under investor diligence: “before you think it,” “94% accuracy… any language, any device,” and the $180B TAM claim. They are weak because they are either scientifically implausible, under-specified, or logically inconsistent with the market evidence cited.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Qwen3 Coder Flash347 words
The Modern Dating World So I went on this date last week, and the guy was really into his phone. I'm thinking, "This is great! He's not distracted by my terrible conversation skills." But then he starts scrolling through his feed while we're eating dinner. And I'm like, "What are you doing?"
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B520 words
Hey, how we doing? Good? Great. I ask because I need validation. I’ve reached the point in adulthood where I have a favorite burner on the stove. Not a favorite appliance, a favorite burner. It’s the front left. It understands me. The back right says “medium heat” and then acts like a small volcano.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3 Coder Flash673 words
Here are the problematic clauses and suggested modifications for the contractor: Scope Modification (Clause 1) Problem: Client can modify scope "at any time without additional compensation" Modification: "Client may modify the scope with prior written notice and 30 days' advance notice.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B6,649 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided and, as drafted, gives the Client multiple ways to extract value from the Contractor while minimizing its own obligations. Some provisions may be unenforceable or limited by law in certain jurisdictions, but even unenforceable clauses can be exploited commercially because the…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs 4.0x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
4.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both: 6.7× input, 4.0× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts

Qwen3 Coder Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$0.97 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp4$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·98.9% upModal$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upNNovita$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·97.7% upTTogether$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·98.3% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
VVenice$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·92.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
43%

Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 21.6x more emoji

Qwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
60%Vocabulary53%
85wSentence Length18w
0.56Hedging0.83
5.6Bold3.1
5.8Lists4.3
0.22Emoji0.00
1.49Headings1.34
0.15Transitions0.05
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 Coder Flash logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoHy4 Preview logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoHunter Alpha logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Hunter AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoInkling logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs InklingNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoINTELLECT-3 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs INTELLECT-3New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoKimi K2 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K2Same size

Model pages

Qwen3 Coder Flash logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash59 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed