Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5
Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen against GPT-5 by OpenAI, context windows of 66K vs 400K, tested across 51 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or GPT-5?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5 are both competitive models. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 66K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is made by qwen while GPT-5 is from openai. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a 66K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5.
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
