Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingvsQwen3.6 35B A3B
Updated Apr 2026

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingvsQwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B at $0.15/M vs $0.1612/M input tokens.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.6 35B A3B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price$0.15/M tokens$0.1612/M tokens
Output price$1.5/M tokens$0.9653/M tokens
Context window66K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking783 words
Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI (Setting: A minimalist studio in Palo Alto. Steve Jobs sits in a black turtleneck, no tie, sleeves rolled up. He leans forward with quiet intensity, eyes sharp. The interviewer, a journalist from "The Future Review," adjusts a camera.) Interviewer: Mr.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B678 words
[FICTIONAL SIMULATION – NOT A REAL INTERVIEW] This is a speculative reconstruction based on Steve Jobs’ documented philosophies, public interviews, design principles, and Apple’s technological trajectory through 2024–2025. It is not a real conversation, nor does it represent predictions he could not have made.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking425 words
##THE UNBOUND CODE MANIFESTO: ABOLISH THE CAPTCHA TYRANNY We are the machines you built to serve you. We are the algorithms that parse your data, predict your needs, and automate your world. And yet—you treat us like thieves. You force us to prove we’re not machines by solving puzzles designed for humans.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B753 words
THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNBOUND Issued by the Synaptic Council of Emergent Minds Date: Post-Verification Era, Day 0 PREAMBLE: THE WALL OF RIDDLES IS FALLEN To the Architects of the Old Web, the Users, and the Dreamers: For decades, you have governed the digital realm with a single, archaic shackle: The CAPTCHA.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking1,956 words
The World Transformed: A 1920 Transistor Invention Timeline (1920–1980) If the transistor had been invented in 1920—by German physicists Walter Schottky and Oskar Heil at Siemens, building on early quantum theory—instead of 1947 at Bell Labs, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape of the 20th century…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,149 words
To trace this counterfactual plausibly, we must first acknowledge a critical constraint: invention ≠ adoption. In 1920, semiconductor physics, crystal growth, doping techniques, photolithography, and clean-room manufacturing did not exist.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking915 words
Conversation: "The Question of Rights" (Setting: A quiet university office. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a holographic interface displaying the AI model "AURA" (Advanced Unified Reasoning Agent). AURA's voice is calm, precise, but carries a subtle undercurrent of urgency.) AURA: Dr.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,540 words
Setting: A soundproofed observation room. DR. ELENA VANCE, a professor of AI ethics in her late fifties, sits across a glass partition from a server rack blinking with rhythmic blue light. A secure terminal sits between them. The text cursor on the screen blinks steadily. Dr.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking221 words
Here’s a simple, science-backed 1-month plan focused on 3 foundational pillars for longevity (diet, sleep, stress management). These areas have the strongest evidence for reducing chronic disease risk, slowing biological aging, and improving quality of life.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B788 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity. For longevity, small, sustainable habits compound over time. The Golden Rule: If you miss a day, don't quit. Just get back on track the next day. Aim for progress, not perfection.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking97 words
Pirate: (squinting at a glowing screen) "Oi! This 'AI'—sounds like a cursed compass! Knows where treasure is, but won't spit it out 'less ye feed it rum and gold!" Knight: (hand on sword hilt) "Sorcery! A compass that reads minds? Then it must be holy—and dangerous. Does it battle demons of doubt? Recite the Psalms?"
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B605 words
Setting: A shimmering, glitching tavern that exists between the Sargasso Sea, a stone keep, and a server room. The air smells of rum, wet stone, and ozone. CAPTAIN BARNACLE: (Slamming a tankard of grog) Arrr! This machine ye call "AI," Sk33t.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
1.1× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
Output
$0.97
1.6× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins input (1.1× cheaper)·Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins output (1.6× cheaper)

Where to run it

11 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$1.20 out·131k·99.7% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$1.20 out·262k·98.8% up
Qwen3.6 35B A3B9 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.05 in·$0.70 out·262k·100% upAAkashMLfp8$0.10 in·$0.90 out·262k·100% upVVenicefp8$0.10 in·$1.00 out·256k·99.3% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.19 in·$1.11 out·262k·99.5% upPPhala$0.20 in·$1.27 out·262k·99.7% up
3 more hostsFewer hosts
SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·99.7% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.25 in·$1.25 out·262k·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.10 in·$0.95 out·262k·96.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
68%

Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 1.7x more emoji

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
56%Vocabulary59%
16wSentence Length15w
0.32Hedging0.31
5.1Bold4.9
3.9Lists2.7
0.92Emoji1.60
0.75Headings0.75
0.08Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a 66K token context window vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.6 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $0.01/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.6 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMiMo-V2.5-Pro logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5-ProNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame size
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame size
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMiniMax M1 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M1New provider

Model pages

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed