MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
2.0× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 6.7× input, 2.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
62%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 4.2x more transitions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
58%Vocabulary54%
22wSentence Length16w
0.61Hedging0.31
5.7Bold6.0
3.1Lists4.5
0.63Emoji0.58
1.40Headings0.88
0.02Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
