MiMo-V2.5-ProvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.15/M vs $1/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $3/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
2.0× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 6.7× input, 2.0× output.
Where to run it
9 hosts, cheapest first
MiMo-V2.5-Pro7 hosts
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 3.4x more transitions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
58%Vocabulary56%
22wSentence Length16w
0.61Hedging0.32
5.7Bold5.1
3.1Lists3.9
0.63Emoji0.92
1.40Headings0.75
0.02Transitions0.08
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2New provider
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M2-herNew provider
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M2.1New provider