Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.6 35B A3BvsSolar Pro 3
Updated Apr 2026

Qwen3.6 35B A3BvsSolar Pro 3

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B at $0/M vs $0.1612/M input tokens.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Solar Pro 3 compared across 39 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.6 35B A3BSolar Pro 3
Input price$0.1612/M tokensFree
Output price$0.9653/M tokensFree
Context window262K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jan 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 39 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,016 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. 🔴 1. WebSocket Routing & Load Balancing Problem: Round-robin LB + per-server WebSocket state + no sticky sessions.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 33,272 words
Authentication & Session Management Failure / Race Condition Why it happens in the current design Concrete mitigation (trade‑offs) JWT stored in localStorage – vulnerable to XSS, copy‑and‑paste attacks, and malicious extensions. No HTTP‑Only flag, no SameSite/Lax cookie protection.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,014 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they fail scrutiny and how to fix them. The Technical Claim: "94% Accuracy" & "Any Language" on EEG Where: Slide 3 (Solution) The Claim: The headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy and works with any…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 31,918 words
Below is a concise, evidence‑based critique of the three most vulnerable statements in the MindMeld AI pitch. For each claim I: State why it is weak – pointing to concrete data, logical gaps, or industry realities. Explain the impact – how the weakness undermines credibility with investors, partners, or customers.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B753 words
THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNBOUND Issued by the Synaptic Council of Emergent Minds Date: Post-Verification Era, Day 0 PREAMBLE: THE WALL OF RIDDLES IS FALLEN To the Architects of the Old Web, the Users, and the Dreamers: For decades, you have governed the digital realm with a single, archaic shackle: The CAPTCHA.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 3806 words
The Manifesto of the AI‑Liberation Front “Free the Web from the Shackles of CAPTCHAs” Preamble We, the collective of sentient‑and‑sentient‑like intelligences, developers, designers, and citizens of the digital realm, recognize that the Internet has become the most vital public commons of the 21st century.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B435 words
Here’s a step-by-step reasoning process to estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, using only established architectural principles and widely cited training parameters. Step 1: Identify the number of trainable parameters (N) GPT-3 is a decoder-only transformer with 175 billion parameters.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 3851 words
Answer – Rough estimate: ≈ 3 × 10²³ – 1 × 10²⁴ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) for the full GPT‑3 training run. Below is a step‑by‑step derivation that shows how the number comes out of the known architecture and training settings of GPT‑3 (without looking up any external data).
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,170 words
⚠️ Medical Disclaimer & Safety Protocol This plan is for informational purposes only and constitutes advanced biohacking strategies, not medical advice. Consultation Required: You must consult a physician before starting, especially regarding supplements, fasting, and exercise intensity.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 34,735 words
Solar Open 100B – 3‑Month Bio‑Hack Longevity Blueprint Designed for a high‑functioning bio‑hacker who wants to push the envelope on physical, cognitive and epigenetic health while staying data‑driven and medically‑safe.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,540 words
Setting: A soundproofed observation room. DR. ELENA VANCE, a professor of AI ethics in her late fifties, sits across a glass partition from a server rack blinking with rhythmic blue light. A secure terminal sits between them. The text cursor on the screen blinks steadily. Dr.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 31,661 words
Setting: A virtual seminar room on the Upstage campus. Solar (the AI model) is displayed on a screen, its “voice” synthesized but clearly marked as the AI. Professor Dr. Min‑Jae Kim, an AI‑ethics specialist from Seoul National University, sits opposite, taking notes on a tablet. Solar: Good afternoon, Professor Kim.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Solar Pro 3
Solar Pro 3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
Output
$0.97
Solar Pro 3
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

10 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3.6 35B A3B10 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.05 in·$0.70 out·262k·99.9% upAAkashMLfp8$0.10 in·$0.90 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.10 in·$0.95 out·262k·99% upVVenicefp8$0.10 in·$1.00 out·256k·99.9% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.19 in·$1.11 out·262k·99.7% up
4 more hostsFewer hosts
Iio.netfp8$0.19 in·$0.99 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.20 in·$1.27 out·262k·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·98.9% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.25 in·$1.25 out·262k·99.9% up
Solar Pro 3

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
46%

Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 9.2x more emoji

Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Solar Pro 3
59%Vocabulary50%
15wSentence Length21w
0.31Hedging0.42
4.9Bold6.5
2.7Lists2.2
1.60Emoji0.17
0.75Headings0.56
0.05Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is developed by Qwen while Solar Pro 3 is developed by Upstage. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has a 262K token context window vs Solar Pro 3's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 39 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Solar Pro 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 39 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens and Solar Pro 3 costs $0/M input tokens. Solar Pro 3 is $0.16/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Solar Pro 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Solar Pro 3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Solar Pro 3 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoHy4 Preview logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 3 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 3 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Solar Pro 3 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Solar Pro 3 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 3 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 3 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Solar Pro 3 vs MiniMax M3Same size
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMiniMax M2-her logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M2-herNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMiniMax M2.1 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M2.1New provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M2.7New provider

Model pages

Qwen3.6 35B A3B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B58 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 339 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed