Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.6 FlashvsSolar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

Qwen3.6 FlashvsSolar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 Flash at $0.05/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Qwen3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.6 FlashSolar Mini 4
Input price$0.25/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$1.5/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Qwen3.6 Flash594 words
Initial Setup & Equity Calculation Item Calculation Amount ($m) Purchase Price $120m × 12.0x 1,440.0 Transaction Fees $1,440m × 2.0% 28.8 Total Debt ($480m TL + $180m Mezz) 660.0 Initial Equity $1,440 + $28.8 − $660 808.8 Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030) (All figures in $m, rounded to 1 decimal.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,718 words
518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Qwen3.6 Flash1,243 words
SYMBIOSIS: Tide, Timber, and Time A Multi-Sensory Exploration of Fungal and Marine Resonance Conceptual Narrative In the Michelin 3-star tradition, a dish must tell a story that transcends sustenance. Symbiosis explores the ancient dialogue between the forest floor and the ocean tide.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,364 words
Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3.6 Flash1,266 words
Disclaimer: The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. EU). You should consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction before signing or negotiating any legal document.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,994 words
This agreement contains several provisions that are heavily one-sided, overly broad, or legally vulnerable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the most exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. Note: Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.6 Flash818 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of LLM training not as magic autocomplete, but as a distributed optimization problem over a continuous, trillion-parameter state space. You’re familiar with tuning hyperparameters in a microservices architecture: you adjust configs, monitor metrics, and iterate.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4893 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer From a systems architecture perspective, the skepticism that "predicting the next word" yields intelligence is understandable, but it stems from viewing the model through a deterministic, code-based lens rather than a probabilistic, distributed-systems lens.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.6 Flash1,180 words
This architecture contains several critical failure modes that would prevent it from functioning as a functional collaborative editor. The combination of round-robin load balancing with persistent WebSocket connections, client-side clock synchronization, HTML-based storage, and aggressive CDN caching creates a system…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,165 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3.6 Flash1,221 words
This alternate timeline assumes that a functional, manufacturable transistor emerges in 1920, and that parallel advances in semiconductor physics, materials purification, and photolithography compress the typical 20–30 year maturation curve.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,539 words
This is a fascinating counterfactual. I need to note upfront that the scientific and engineering foundations for a working transistor did not exist in 1920. Quantum mechanics was barely a decade old, band theory of solids hadn't been developed, and semiconductor physics (doping, p-n junctions, electron mobility) was…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash
Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.6 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Solar Mini 4 costs 7.5x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 Flash
Input
$0.25
Output
$1.50
Solar Mini 4
Input
$0.05
5.0× cheaper
Output
$0.20
7.5× cheaper

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on both: 5.0× input, 7.5× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Qwen3.6 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.19 in·$1.13 out·1M·100% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Qwen3.6 Flash is developed by Qwen while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. Qwen3.6 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.6 Flash costs $0.25/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoCommand A+ logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoOpenAI Codex Mini logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs OpenAI Codex MiniSame size
Qwen3.6 Flash logoCypher Alpha (free) logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Cypher Alpha (free)New provider
Solar Mini 4 logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs DeepSeek V3.1New provider
Qwen3.6 Flash logoDeepSeek Prover V2 logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek Prover V2New provider

Model pages

Qwen3.6 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Solar Mini 4 logo
Solar Mini 419 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed