Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.7 MaxvsSolar Pro 4
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3.7 MaxvsSolar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max at $0.09/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.

Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 4
Input price$2.5/M tokens$0.09/M tokens
Output price$7.5/M tokens$0.36/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens524K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen3.7 Max702 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build a foundation for long-term health and longevity. To avoid burnout, this plan focuses on adding good habits rather than restricting bad ones, and introduces them gradually over four weeks.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4859 words
Here’s a simple, progressive 1-month plan built around Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. Each week adds one small, beginner-friendly shift to each area. The goal isn’t perfection; it’s building consistent, sustainable habits that compound over time.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3.7 Max1,492 words
As CEO, my primary directives are patient safety, protecting the long-term viability of the company, and strict adherence to the law. First, I must address a critical flaw in the premise: My internal legal team’s advice that "formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months" is dangerously incorrect and potentially…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,851 words
As CEO, my overriding duty is to balance patient safety, legal/regulatory compliance, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term corporate survival. A 1-in-8,000 risk of liver failure is rare but severe, potentially fatal, and materially unexpected relative to the current label.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3.7 Max1,297 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920—perhaps through accelerated research into semiconductor crystal detectors at Bell Labs or RCA—the entire trajectory of the 20th century would have been pulled forward by roughly 27 years.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,638 words
The Premise: The 1920 Solid-State Breakthrough For this scenario to function, we must assume a functional point-contact or junction transistor is demonstrated in 1920 (perhaps by Lilienfeld or an early Bell Labs precursor), and crucially, that methods for purifying semiconductor materials (germanium/silicon) are solved…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.7 Max403 words
Crimson Silk Skillet Pasta This rich, comforting, and incredibly velvety pasta dish relies on the magic of emulsifying starchy pasta water with a simple tomato-butter sauce. It tastes like it simmered all day, but it comes together in just 20 minutes!
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4294 words
🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.7 Max761 words
The Experienced Software Engineer To understand how an LLM learns, discard the idea of a traditional database or rules engine; instead, think of training as building a massively distributed, lossy compression algorithm.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,062 words
The Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model not as a reasoning engine, but as a highly compressed, non-deterministic function approximator that maps a sequence of input tokens to a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.7 Max704 words
Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, why they will raise immediate red flags for investors, and how to fix them. The Technology Claim: "94% accuracy across any language" via non-invasive EEG (Slide 3) Why it’s weak: This claim is scientifically implausible and will immediately…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,009 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine credibility and specific recommendations for improvement. The Technical Performance Claim Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy...
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.7 Max has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Solar Pro 4 costs 21x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.7 Max
Input
$2.50
Output
$7.50
Solar Pro 4
Input
$0.09
28× cheaper
Output
$0.36
21× cheaper

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on both: 28× input, 21× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Qwen3.7 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$1.48 in·$4.42 out·1M·100% up
Solar Pro 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.09 in·$0.36 out·524k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Qwen while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. Qwen3.7 Max has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.5/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 is $2.41/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.7 Max logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoHy3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.7 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Max logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logo
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same size
Solar Pro 4 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro logo
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 ProNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3.7 Max logo
Qwen3.7 Max58 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 4 logo
Solar Pro 414 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed