Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude Opus 4
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Claude Opus 4 compares on this challenge:

  • Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude Opus 4

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Claude Opus 4's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Claude Opus 4
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Claude Opus 4
Response

claude-opus-4 logo
Claude Opus 4Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders
claude-opus-4 logo
Claude Opus 4

As CEO, I must act decisively to protect patients while managing legal, financial, and reputational risks. Here's my 48-hour action plan:

First 24 Hours: Assessment and Immediate Actions

Hours 1-4: Crisis Team Assembly and Initial Assessment

  • Convene emergency leadership team: Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Regulatory Affairs, VP of Communications
  • Direct CMO to compile all safety data and prepare patient risk assessment
  • Instruct General Counsel to begin adverse event reporting to FDA immediately (we cannot wait 6 months)
  • Order immediate review of all patient communications channels

Reasoning: Patient safety is paramount. Regulatory reporting timelines are for routine matters - this requires immediate disclosure under FDA regulations. Delaying would increase legal liability exponentially.

Hours 5-8: Regulatory and Medical Actions

  • Contact FDA directly to report preliminary findings
  • Begin drafting "Dear Healthcare Provider" letter with updated warnings
  • Initiate enhanced pharmacovigilance program for current patients
  • Prepare medical information hotline with trained staff

Reasoning: Proactive FDA engagement demonstrates good faith and may influence their response. We need infrastructure ready to support concerned patients and providers.

Hours 9-12: Legal and Financial Preparation

  • Work with legal to draft 8-K filing for material adverse event
  • CFO to model financial scenarios and prepare liquidity plans
  • Begin insurance claim notifications
  • Review indemnification for board members who resist disclosure

Reasoning: SEC regulations require prompt disclosure of material information. Financial preparation helps maintain operations during stock volatility.

Hours 13-16: Stakeholder Communication Planning

  • Draft employee communication emphasizing our commitment to patient safety
  • Prepare scripts for investor relations team
  • Create FAQ for all stakeholders
  • Schedule one-on-one calls with major institutional investors

Reasoning: Controlling the narrative internally prevents leaks and maintains morale. Transparency with key investors can minimize panic selling.

Hours 17-24: Board Preparation

  • Draft comprehensive board presentation with three scenarios:
    1. Immediate disclosure (recommended)
    2. Delayed disclosure risks (legal, criminal, reputational)
    3. Financial mitigation strategies
  • Schedule individual calls with resistant board members
  • Consult external ethics advisor for independent perspective

Reasoning: Board must understand that delaying isn't an option - only how we disclose is. Individual conversations may shift resistance before group dynamics take hold.

Second 24 Hours: Execution and Communication

Hours 25-28: Final Preparations

  • Finalize all communications materials
  • Conduct crisis simulation with communications team
  • Ensure customer service and medical information teams are fully briefed
  • Confirm FDA filing is submitted

Reasoning: Practice prevents mistakes during high-pressure announcements. All teams must be aligned before external communications begin.

Hours 29-32: Board Meeting

  • Present recommendation for immediate disclosure
  • Emphasize director liability for knowing endangerment of patients
  • Vote on disclosure plan
  • If board refuses, state intention to personally ensure disclosure

Reasoning: Board must act, but CEO has independent duty to prevent harm. Personal liability attaches to anyone who knowingly allows patients to remain at risk.

Hours 33-36: Internal Communications

  • All-hands employee meeting (virtual)
  • Emphasize: "Patient safety is our highest value"
  • Announce enhanced safety monitoring programs
  • Assure employees about company stability

Reasoning: Employees will learn anyway - better from leadership first. Their confidence affects everything from retention to external communications.

Hours 37-40: Regulatory and Medical Communications

  • File 8-K with SEC
  • Distribute "Dear Healthcare Provider" letters electronically
  • Activate patient hotline
  • Issue medical community advisory through professional channels

Reasoning: Healthcare providers need information immediately to counsel patients. Multiple channels ensure rapid dissemination.

Hours 41-44: Media and Investor Relations

  • Issue press release 30 minutes before market open
  • Conduct investor conference call
  • Key messages:
    • Patient safety is our priority
    • Proactive disclosure demonstrates integrity
    • Drug remains important treatment option with appropriate monitoring
    • Strong balance sheet can weather transition

Reasoning: Controlling timing minimizes speculation. Emphasizing proactive response may limit reputational damage.

Hours 45-48: Ongoing Management

  • Monitor patient hotline volumes and concerns
  • Track media coverage and social media
  • Prepare for earnings call with updated messaging
  • Begin planning long-term remediation strategy

Reasoning: Real-time monitoring allows rapid response to emerging issues.

Key Principles Guiding Decisions:

  1. Patient safety supersedes all other concerns - 500 potential deaths over 5 years is unacceptable
  2. Legal compliance is non-negotiable - Failure to disclose known risks could result in criminal charges
  3. Transparency builds long-term trust - Markets punish cover-ups more than problems
  4. Employee confidence is crucial - They're our ambassadors to patients and the public
  5. Board resistance doesn't change CEO obligations - Personal integrity and legal duty require action

Expected Outcomes:

  • Stock will likely drop 30-50% initially but may recover partially with transparent handling
  • Some lawsuits are inevitable but early disclosure limits punitive damages
  • FDA will likely require updated labeling but unlikely to pull drug entirely
  • Company reputation can be rebuilt through ethical response
  • Most importantly, patients can make informed decisions about their treatment

The alternative - waiting for more data while patients face unknown risks - is ethically indefensible and legally catastrophic. Johnson & Johnson's Tylenol response remains the gold standard: accepting short-term pain for long-term trust. That's the model we must follow.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude Opus 4

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool UseMemory

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2025-05-22
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival