Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. DeepSeek V3.2
  4. Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

See how DeepSeek V3.2 compares on this challenge:

  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to DeepSeek V3.2

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

Deepseek V3 2's response to the 'Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)' challenge.

DeepSeek V3.2
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B spend management + AP automation SaaS for mid-market enterprises. Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise, not investment advice. DATA - Current share price: $46 - Shares outstanding (basic): 190m - Net cash: $1.4B - FY2023 revenue: $560m - FY2024 revenue: $680m - FY2025 revenue: $820m - FY2025 gross margin: 78% - FY2025 operating margin: 18% - Revenue mix: 92% subscription, 8% services (services GM ~25%, subscription GM ~82%) - Customer KPIs: 6,200 customers; ARPA ~$132k; logo churn 6%/yr; gross retention 94%; NRR 123% - CAC payback: 18 months; S&M as % of revenue: 34% in FY2025 - Concentration: top 10 customers = 16% of revenue; top 1 = 3% - D&A: 2.5% of revenue - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Net working capital investment: 1.0% of incremental revenue - Cash tax rate: 23% VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS (build 2026-2030 forecasts) Base case: - Revenue growth: 21%, 18%, 15%, 13%, 12% - Gross margin: 79%, 80%, 80%, 81%, 81% - Operating margin: 20%, 22%, 24%, 25%, 26% - WACC: 10%, terminal growth: 3% Bull case: - Revenue growth: 25%, 21%, 18%, 15%, 13% - Gross margin: 80%, 81%, 82%, 82%, 83% - Operating margin: 21%, 24%, 26%, 28%, 29% - WACC: 9%, terminal growth: 4% Bear case: - Revenue growth: 16%, 13%, 11%, 10%, 9% - Gross margin: 78%, 78%, 79%, 79%, 80% - Operating margin: 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21% - WACC: 12%, terminal growth: 2% COMPS (fictional peer set) - Peer A: EV/NTM Revenue 9.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 35x - Peer B: EV/NTM Revenue 7.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 28x - Peer C: EV/NTM Revenue 11.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 42x Use the median multiple as your comps anchor, but explain adjustments. TASK Write a pro-level IC memo with: 1) Recommendation (Long/Short/Pass) + 12-month PT range + 2-sentence thesis 2) Business + why it wins / why now 3) KPI quality check (NRR, churn, CAC payback, concentration) and what could be wrong 4) Base/Bull/Bear model: show a compact table for 2026-2030 revenue, EBIT, and unlevered FCF; compute DCF EV, equity value, and implied value per share for each scenario (show key steps, not every line) 5) Comps cross-check: implied EV and per-share range using median multiples 6) Catalysts (3), Risks (5), and "what would change my mind" (3 falsifiable triggers) 7) 10 diligence questions for management Keep the memo under ~1,200 words, excluding tables.

DeepSeek V3.2
Response

deepseek-v3.2 logo
DeepSeek V3.2Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)
deepseek-v3.2 logo
DeepSeek V3.2

TO: Investment Committee
FROM: [Your Name/Team]
DATE: 20 March 2025
RE: Investment Recommendation – LedgerLift (LLLT)


1. Recommendation & Thesis

Recommendation: LONG
12-Month Price Target Range: $58 – $72
Thesis: LedgerLift is a capital-efficient, high-retention SaaS platform in a non-discretionary spend category, trading below intrinsic value due to overly conservative growth expectations. Our base case implies ~35% upside, supported by durable mid-teens growth, expanding margins, and a robust net cash balance sheet. The combination of a 123% NRR and reasonable 18-month CAC payback suggests a scalable model not fully reflected in the current multiple.


2. Business & Why It Wins / Why Now

LedgerLift provides B2B spend management and accounts payable automation software to mid-market enterprises. This is a “must-have” category focused on operational efficiency and cost control, making it relatively resilient in economic downturns. The company wins by targeting the underserved mid-market, where legacy systems and manual processes create a high ROI for automation. The “why now” is driven by the ongoing digitization of finance functions, regulatory push for transparency, and the need for working capital optimization post-higher interest rates. Its integrated suite (from procurement to payment) drives stickiness and cross-sell, evidenced by strong net revenue retention.


3. KPI Quality Check & What Could Be Wrong

  • NRR (123%) & Gross Retention (94%): Excellent. Indicates strong up-sell/cross-sell and high core utility. However, 123% is at the upper end of sustainability for mid-market; some moderation over time is likely.
  • Logo Churn (6%): Respectable for mid-market, but not best-in-class. Suggests some vulnerability in the lower end of the customer base.
  • CAC Payback (18 months): Solid at current growth rates, implying efficient growth investments. However, it assumes stable sales efficiency; competition could drive CAC higher.
  • Concentration (Top 10 = 16%, Top 1 = 3%): Acceptable risk. Low single-customer dependency is a positive.

What Could Be Wrong: The KPIs paint a picture of health, but the key risk is aggregation bias. The high NRR could be driven by price increases rather than usage growth, masking potential erosion in user engagement. The 6% logo churn, while good, could accelerate if the product fails to keep pace with enterprise-grade features demanded by larger mid-market clients.


4. Financial Forecast & DCF Valuation

We project financials from FY2026–2030 under three scenarios, discounting unlevered FCFs at scenario-specific WACCs.

Key Forecast Table (Base Case)

YearRevenue ($m)EBIT ($m)UFCF ($m)*
2026992198161
20271,171258215
20281,347323268
20291,522381322
20301,705443378

UFCF calc: EBIT(1-23% tax) + D&A – Capex – ΔNWC. D&A ~2.5%, Capex ~3%, ΔNWC ~1% of incremental revenue.

DCF Valuation Summary

ScenarioPV of Explicit FCF ($B)Terminal Value ($B)Enterprise Value ($B)Equity Value ($B)Implied Share Price
Bull0.710.210.912.3$72
Base0.66.47.08.4$62
Bear0.43.03.44.8$38

Calculation Steps (Base Case Example):

  1. Projected Revenue & EBIT using given growth and margin assumptions.
  2. Calculated UFCF: EBIT less cash taxes, added back D&A, subtracted Capex and NWC investment.
  3. Discounted 2026-2030 UFCF at 10% WACC: PV = $0.6B.
  4. Calculated Terminal Value as of 2030: TV = (UFCF₃₀ * (1+3%)) / (10% - 3%) = $6.4B. Discounted to PV: $4.0B.
  5. Enterprise Value = $0.6B + $4.0B = $7.0B.
  6. Equity Value = EV + Net Cash ($1.4B) = $8.4B.
  7. Per Share = $8.4B / 190M shares = $62.

5. Comps Cross-Check

Median peer multiples: EV/NTM Revenue: 9.0x, EV/NTM EBIT: 35x.

  • Using EV/NTM Revenue (9.0x): We estimate LLLT's FY2026 revenue at $992m. Implied EV = $992m * 9.0 = $8.93B. Equity Value = $8.93B + $1.4B = $10.33B. Implied Share Price = $54.
  • Using EV/NTM EBIT (35x): FY2026 EBIT = $198m. Implied EV = $198m * 35 = $6.93B. Equity Value = $6.93B + $1.4B = $8.33B. Implied Share Price = $44.

Adjustment & Range: LedgerLift's growth profile (~21% in '26) is healthy but may be below the highest-flying comps. Its superior retention and cash generation warrant a premium to the median EBIT multiple but a modest discount to the highest revenue multiples. A blended view suggests a fair comps-based EV range of $7.5B–$9.0B, or $47–$55 per share. This supports our DCF-derived base case.


6. Catalysts, Risks & Falsifiable Triggers

Catalysts:

  1. Profitability Inflection: Operating margin expansion from 18% (FY25) toward 20%+ in FY26, demonstrating operating leverage.
  2. Strategic Partnerships: Announcements with major ERP or banking platforms to accelerate customer acquisition.
  3. Capital Deployment: Initiation of a share repurchase program, leveraging the strong net cash position.

Risks:

  1. Competitive Intensification: Entry of larger fintech/ERP players into the mid-market niche.
  2. Growth Deceleration: Failure to maintain >20% growth as the base expands, triggering multiple contraction.
  3. Customer Concentration Risk: Loss of a top-5 customer could impact revenues and sentiment.
  4. Integration/M&A Risk: Attempts to accelerate growth via acquisitions that are dilutive or disruptive.
  5. Macro Sensitivity: A severe recession could pressure mid-market customer budgets and increase churn.

What Would Change My Mind (Falsifiable Triggers):

  1. NRR sustained below 115% for two consecutive quarters, indicating deteriorating product stickiness.
  2. CAC payback extending beyond 24 months while growth decelerates, signaling broken unit economics.
  3. Operating margins failing to expand year-over-year in FY26 despite revenue growth >20%, indicating poor cost control or pricing pressure.

7. Diligence Questions for Management

  1. What is driving the 123% NRR? Please break it down between price, seat expansion, and new module adoption.
  2. How are you mitigating the risk of logo churn (6%) at the lower end of the mid-market?
  3. What is the strategy for the top 10 customers (16% of revenue)? Are you investing in dedicated resources to protect and grow these accounts?
  4. How do you plan to deploy the $1.4B net cash balance?
  5. What are the key assumptions behind your long-term operating margin target of 26%+?
  6. What is the competitive win/loss analysis showing? Who are you losing to, and why?
  7. How much of the revenue growth is coming from international expansion, and what are the unit economics there?
  8. Can you discuss the pipeline for new product modules or platform extensions over the next 18 months?
  9. How does the sales motion differ for acquiring a new logo versus expanding within an existing customer?
  10. What is the single most important operational metric you track that isn't on this slide?
Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About DeepSeek V3.2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Deepseek
Released
2025-12-01
Size
LARGE
Context
131,072 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival