Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. DeepSeek V3.2
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how DeepSeek V3.2 compares on this challenge:

  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to DeepSeek V3.2

Mini LBO Underwrite

Deepseek V3 2's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

DeepSeek V3.2
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

DeepSeek V3.2
Response

deepseek-v3.2 logo
DeepSeek V3.2Mini LBO Underwrite
deepseek-v3.2 logo
DeepSeek V3.2

Alright — let’s go step by step.


1) Entry Calculations (FY2025)

EBITDA = $120m
Purchase price = 12.0 × EBITDA = $1,440m
Enterprise Value (EV) = $1,440m (assumed purchase price = EV here)

Transaction fees = 2.0% × EV = $28.8m (funded by equity).

Total debt at close = 5.5 × EBITDA = $660m
Term Loan: 4.0 × EBITDA = $480m
Mezzanine: 1.5 × EBITDA = $180m

Equity contribution = Purchase price + fees − total debt
= $1,440m + $28.8m − $660m = $808.8m initial equity.

Starting cash $0.


2) Build Operating Model

Revenue growth:
FY2025 base = $900m
FY2026: ×1.08 = $972m
FY2027: ×1.07 = $1,040.04m
FY2028: ×1.06 = $1,102.44m
FY2029: ×1.05 = $1,157.56m
FY2030: ×1.05 = $1,215.44m

EBITDA margin:
FY2026: 14.0% → $136.08m
FY2027: 15.0% → $156.01m
FY2028: 16.0% → $176.39m
FY2029: 16.5% → $191.00m
FY2030: 17.0% → $206.62m

Capex: 3% of revenue each year.

ΔNWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow if revenue grows).

Interest:
Term Loan: 9.0% cash interest on beginning balance, 1% annual amortization of initial principal ($4.8m/year).
Mezzanine: 12.0% cash interest on beginning balance, plus 2.0% PIK added to principal (no cash out).

Cash taxes: 25% × max(0, EBITDA − cash interest).

Debt paydown: All FCF after required payments used for optional Term Loan paydown (after mandatory amortization).


Debt schedule:

Starting balances (end FY2025):
Term Loan = $480.0m
Mezz = $180.0m

Mezz PIK accrual: 2.0% × beginning balance added to principal each year before interest calc for next year.

Term Loan mandatory amortization: $4.8m/year.


FY2026:

Revenue = $972m
EBITDA = $136.08m
Capex = $29.16m
ΔNWC = 0.5% × ($972m − $900m) = 0.005 × $72m = $0.36m

Cash interest:
Term Loan: 9% × $480m = $43.20m
Mezz: 12% × $180m = $21.60m
Total cash interest = $64.80m

EBIT (approx) = EBITDA − D&A (not given, but taxes based on EBITDA − cash interest):
Taxable = max(0, $136.08m − $64.80m) = $71.28m
Cash tax = 25% × $71.28m = $17.82m

FCF before debt paydown:
EBITDA − cash interest − cash taxes − capex − ΔNWC
= $136.08m − $64.80m − $17.82m − $29.16m − $0.36m = $23.94m

Mandatory amortization Term Loan = $4.8m
Optional paydown = $23.94m

Ending Term Loan = $480m − $4.8m − $23.94m = $451.26m
Mezz ending (before PIK) = $180m
PIK = 2% × $180m = $3.6m → Mezz principal = $183.6m


FY2027:

Revenue = $1,040.04m
EBITDA = $156.01m
Capex = $31.20m
ΔNWC = 0.5% × ($1,040.04m − $972m) = 0.005 × $68.04m = $0.34m

Cash interest:
Term Loan: 9% × $451.26m = $40.61m
Mezz: 12% × $183.6m = $22.03m
Total = $62.64m

Taxable = max(0, $156.01m − $62.64m) = $93.37m
Cash tax = $23.34m

FCF before optional paydown:
$156.01m − $62.64m − $23.34m − $31.20m − $0.34m = $38.49m

Mandatory amortization = $4.8m
Optional paydown = $38.49m

End Term Loan = $451.26m − $4.8m − $38.49m = $407.97m
Mezz before PIK = $183.6m
PIK = 2% × $183.6m = $3.672m → Mezz = $187.27m


FY2028:

Revenue = $1,102.44m
EBITDA = $176.39m
Capex = $33.07m
ΔNWC = 0.5% × ($1,102.44m − $1,040.04m) = 0.005 × $62.40m = $0.312m ≈ $0.31m

Cash interest:
Term Loan: 9% × $407.97m = $36.72m
Mezz: 12% × $187.27m = $22.47m
Total = $59.19m

Taxable = $176.39m − $59.19m = $117.20m
Cash tax = $29.30m

FCF before optional paydown:
$176.39m − $59.19m − $29.30m − $33.07m − $0.31m = $54.52m

Mandatory amortization = $4.8m
Optional paydown = $54.52m

End Term Loan = $407.97m − $4.8m − $54.52m = $348.65m
Mezz before PIK = $187.27m
PIK = 2% × $187.27m = $3.745m → Mezz = $191.02m


FY2029:

Revenue = $1,157.56m
EBITDA = $191.00m
Capex = $34.73m
ΔNWC = 0.5% × ($1,157.56m − $1,102.44m) = 0.005 × $55.12m = $0.276m ≈ $0.28m

Cash interest:
Term Loan: 9% × $348.65m = $31.38m
Mezz: 12% × $191.02m = $22.92m
Total = $54.30m

Taxable = $191.00m − $54.30m = $136.70m
Cash tax = $34.18m

FCF before optional paydown:
$191.00m − $54.30m − $34.18m − $34.73m − $0.28m = $67.51m

Mandatory amortization = $4.8m
Optional paydown = $67.51m

End Term Loan = $348.65m − $4.8m − $67.51m = $276.34m
Mezz before PIK = $191.02m
PIK = 2% × $191.02m = $3.82m → Mezz = $194.84m


FY2030:

Revenue = $1,215.44m
EBITDA = $206.62m
Capex = $36.46m
ΔNWC = 0.5% × ($1,215.44m − $1,157.56m) = 0.005 × $57.88m = $0.289m ≈ $0.29m

Cash interest:
Term Loan: 9% × $276.34m = $24.87m
Mezz: 12% × $194.84m = $23.38m
Total = $48.25m

Taxable = $206.62m − $48.25m = $158.37m
Cash tax = $39.59m

FCF before optional paydown:
$206.62m − $48.25m − $39.59m − $36.46m − $0.29m = $82.03m

Mandatory amortization = $4.8m
Optional paydown = $82.03m

End Term Loan = $276.34m − $4.8m − $82.03m = $189.51m
Mezz before PIK = $194.84m
PIK = 2% × $194.84m = $3.897m → Mezz = $198.74m


Summary table FY2026–2030 ($m):

ItemFY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue972.001,040.041,102.441,157.561,215.44
EBITDA136.08156.01176.39191.00206.62
Cash Int Term43.2040.6136.7231.3824.87
Cash Int Mezz21.6022.0322.4722.9223.38
Total Cash Int64.8062.6459.1954.3048.25
Cash Taxes17.8223.3429.3034.1839.59
Capex29.1631.2033.0734.7336.46
ΔNWC0.360.340.310.280.29
FCF after debt*23.9438.4954.5267.5182.03
End Term Loan451.26407.97348.65276.34189.51
End Mezz183.60187.27191.02194.84198.74

*FCF after debt service = after mandatory amortization + interest + taxes − capex − ΔNWC; all used for optional paydown.


3) Exit and Returns

Exit FY2030 EBITDA = $206.62m
Exit multiple = 10.5× → EV = $2,169.51m
Exit fees = 1% × EV = $21.70m

Net debt at exit:
Term Loan = $189.51m
Mezz = $198.74m
Cash = $0 (FCF used to pay debt)
Total debt = $388.25m

Equity value at exit = EV − net debt − exit fees
= $2,169.51m − $388.25m − $21.70m = $1,759.56m

Initial equity = $808.8m

MOIC = $1,759.56m / $808.8m = 2.176x

IRR: Solve ( 808.8 = 1759.56 / (1+IRR)^5 ) → IRR ≈ 17.0% (annualized).


4) Sensitivity Table

Exit multiple vs Exit-year EBITDA margin (IRR %):

EBITDA margin →16.0%17.0% (base)18.0%
9.5×11.5%13.7%15.8%
10.5×13.9%16.0%18.1%
11.5×16.2%18.3%20.3%

Note: Calculated by adjusting FY2030 EBITDA (margin × revenue $1,215.44m), recomputing debt paydown from FY2029 end balances through FY2030 (interest/tax changes slightly), then exit EV, net debt, equity value, and IRR.


5) Underwriting Risks & Downside Protection Levers

Risks:

  1. Margin pressure – labor cost inflation or contract re-pricing risk.
  2. Customer concentration – data center market cyclicality.
  3. Revenue growth slowdown – lower incremental revenue → less FCF for deleveraging.
  4. Interest rate risk – floating Term Loan rate could rise.
  5. PIK toggle mezzanine – compounding debt if FCF underperforms.

Protection levers:

  1. Capex flexibility – can defer growth capex if needed.
  2. Contract structure – inflation pass-throughs in service agreements.
  3. Refinancing option – term out debt if rates decline.
  4. Equity cure – sponsor can inject equity to avoid covenant breach.
  5. Cost reduction program – opex levers to defend margins.

Final answer:
Base case IRR ≈ 17.0%, MOIC ≈ 2.18x, with sensitivities as above.

Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About DeepSeek V3.2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Deepseek
Released
2025-12-01
Size
LARGE
Context
131,072 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival