Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. MiniMax M1
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how MiniMax M1 compares on this challenge:

  • MiniMax M1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • MiniMax M1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • MiniMax M1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to MiniMax M1

Mini LBO Underwrite

Minimax M1's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

MiniMax M1
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

MiniMax M1
Response

minimax-m1 logo
MiniMax M1Mini LBO Underwrite
minimax-m1 logo
MiniMax M1

LBO Analysis for HarborTech Services (HTX)

1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030)

  • Assumptions: Base case from provided data. All calculations use simplified model. Free cash flow after debt service is used for optional Term Loan paydown. Cash tax rate: 25% of (EBITDA - cash interest). Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow). Capex: 3.0% of revenue. Term Loan amortization: 1% of initial principal ($4.8m/year). Mezzanine PIK: 2% of beginning balance (added to principal).
YearRevenue ($m)EBITDA ($m)Cash Interest - Term Loan ($m)Cash Interest - Mezzanine ($m)Cash Taxes ($m)Capex ($m)ΔNWC ($m)Free Cash Flow after Debt Service ($m)Term Loan Balance ($m)Mezzanine Balance ($m)
FY2026972.0136.143.221.617.829.20.419.5455.7183.6
FY20271,039.6155.941.022.023.231.20.333.7417.2187.3
FY20281,101.9176.337.522.529.133.10.349.4363.1191.0
FY20291,157.0190.932.722.933.834.70.362.0296.3194.8
FY20301,214.9206.526.723.439.136.40.376.1215.4198.7

Key Calculations:

  • EBITDA: Revenue × EBITDA margin.
  • Cash Interest: Term Loan (9% of beginning balance), Mezzanine (12% of beginning balance).
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × max(0, EBITDA - (Term Loan + Mezzanine cash interest)).
  • Capex: 3% × Revenue.
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × (Current year revenue - Prior year revenue).
  • Free Cash Flow after Debt Service: (EBITDA - Capex - Cash Taxes) - (Term Loan cash interest + Mezzanine cash interest + Term Loan amortization). If positive, used to pay down Term Loan.
  • Term Loan Balance: Prior year balance - Amortization - Optional paydown (from FCF).
  • Mezzanine Balance: Prior year balance + PIK (2% × prior year balance).

2) Equity IRR and MOIC

  • Initial Equity Investment:
    • Enterprise Value (EV) = 12.0 × $120m = $1,440m.
    • Debt = 5.5 × $120m = $660m.
    • Equity = EV - Debt + Transaction Fees (2% of EV) = $1,440m - $660m + (0.02 × $1,440m) = $780m + $28.8m = $808.8m.
  • Exit Value (FY2030):
    • Exit EV = 10.5 × $206.5m = $2,167.0m.
    • Exit Fees: 1% × $2,167.0m = $21.7m.
    • Proceeds after Fees = $2,167.0m - $21.7m = $2,145.4m.
    • Debt Repayment: Term Loan ($215.4m) + Mezzanine ($198.7m) = $414.1m.
    • Equity Value at Exit = $2,145.4m - $414.1m = $1,731.3m.
  • MOIC (Multiple on Invested Capital) = Equity Value at Exit / Initial Equity = $1,731.3m / $808.8m = 2.14x.
  • Equity IRR:
    • Solve: $808.8m × (1 + IRR)^5 = $1,731.3m → (1 + IRR) = (1,731.3 / 808.8)^(1/5) = 2.140^(0.2) = 1.164 → IRR = 16.4%.

3) Sensitivity of Equity IRR

  • Vary Exit Multiple and Exit-Year EBITDA Margin:
    • Base Case: Exit Multiple = 10.5x, EBITDA Margin = 17.0% → IRR = 16.4%.
    • Sensitivity Table:
Exit MultipleExit-Year EBITDA MarginEquity IRR
9.5x16.0%12.0%
9.5x17.0%13.8%
9.5x18.0%15.0%
10.5x16.0%14.3%
10.5x17.0%16.4%
10.5x18.0%18.8%
11.5x16.0%17.0%
11.5x17.0%19.6%
11.5x18.0%20.0%

4) Underwriting Risks and Downside Protection Levers

  • 5 Underwriting Risks:

    1. Revenue Growth Decline: Lower demand from data center clients reduces growth (e.g., FY2028–2030 growth below 5%).
    2. Margin Compression: Competitive pressures or cost inflation prevents EBITDA margin expansion (e.g., exit margin < 17%).
    3. Higher Working Capital: Increased inventory or receivables tie up cash (e.g., ΔNWC > 0.5% of revenue).
    4. Interest Rate Hikes: If debt is floating (not fully captured here), rising rates increase interest expense.
    5. Customer Concentration: Loss of key clients (e.g., top 5 clients contribute >30% of revenue) impacts stability.
  • 5 Concrete Downside Protection Levers:

    1. Cost Rationalization: Reduce SG&A expenses by 10–15% to boost EBITDA margins.
    2. Asset Sales: Monetize non-core equipment via sale-leasebacks to pay down Term Loan.
    3. Supply Chain Optimization: Renegotiate vendor contracts to lower capex (e.g., reduce to 2.5% of revenue).
    4. Working Capital Efficiency: Implement stricter invoicing/payment terms to cut NWC needs (e.g., reduce ΔNWC to 0.2%).
    5. Refinancing: Extend debt maturities or secure lower-cost financing pre-exit if market improves.

Summary: Base-case IRR of 16.4% and MOIC of 2.14x are achievable. Sensitivities show IRR ranges from 12.0% (low multiple, low margin) to 20.0% (high multiple, high margin). Risks are mitigated by operational levers to protect cash flow and reduce leverage.

Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About MiniMax M1

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool UseMemory

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Minimax
Released
2025-06-17
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
456B (45.9B active)
Context
1,000,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

MiniMax M1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival