4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Minimax M1's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.
You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.
1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030)
| Year | Revenue ($m) | EBITDA ($m) | Cash Interest - Term Loan ($m) | Cash Interest - Mezzanine ($m) | Cash Taxes ($m) | Capex ($m) | ΔNWC ($m) | Free Cash Flow after Debt Service ($m) | Term Loan Balance ($m) | Mezzanine Balance ($m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 972.0 | 136.1 | 43.2 | 21.6 | 17.8 | 29.2 | 0.4 | 19.5 | 455.7 | 183.6 |
| FY2027 | 1,039.6 | 155.9 | 41.0 | 22.0 | 23.2 | 31.2 | 0.3 | 33.7 | 417.2 | 187.3 |
| FY2028 | 1,101.9 | 176.3 | 37.5 | 22.5 | 29.1 | 33.1 | 0.3 | 49.4 | 363.1 | 191.0 |
| FY2029 | 1,157.0 | 190.9 | 32.7 | 22.9 | 33.8 | 34.7 | 0.3 | 62.0 | 296.3 | 194.8 |
| FY2030 | 1,214.9 | 206.5 | 26.7 | 23.4 | 39.1 | 36.4 | 0.3 | 76.1 | 215.4 | 198.7 |
Key Calculations:
2) Equity IRR and MOIC
3) Sensitivity of Equity IRR
| Exit Multiple | Exit-Year EBITDA Margin | Equity IRR |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5x | 16.0% | 12.0% |
| 9.5x | 17.0% | 13.8% |
| 9.5x | 18.0% | 15.0% |
| 10.5x | 16.0% | 14.3% |
| 10.5x | 17.0% | 16.4% |
| 10.5x | 18.0% | 18.8% |
| 11.5x | 16.0% | 17.0% |
| 11.5x | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| 11.5x | 18.0% | 20.0% |
4) Underwriting Risks and Downside Protection Levers
5 Underwriting Risks:
5 Concrete Downside Protection Levers:
Summary: Base-case IRR of 16.4% and MOIC of 2.14x are achievable. Sensitivities show IRR ranges from 12.0% (low multiple, low margin) to 20.0% (high multiple, high margin). Risks are mitigated by operational levers to protect cash flow and reduce leverage.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link