Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-5.3-Codex
Updated Feb 2026

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex is cheaper than ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) at $1.75/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Loading the build
GPT-5.3-Codex

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

15 prompts
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, it would have profoundly altered the course of 20th-century history. The transistor—a small semiconductor device capable of amplifying and switching electronic signals—replaced bulky, fragile vacuum tubes and enabled the miniaturization and mass production…

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Great counterfactual. The key is: an invention date of 1920 does not automatically mean 1920s mass adoption. You still need crystal purity, manufacturing methods, and circuit design culture. But if transistor research starts in 1920, a realistic outcome is a ~15–20 year pull-forward of the electronics age.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Sure. Here's a 3-minute stand-up bit without puns: You ever notice how nobody tells you when you’ve become an adult? It’s not your 18th birthday. That’s a scam. I still thought pizza was a food group and that “filing taxes” meant putting my receipts in a shoebox.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Good evening, everybody! I’ve reached that age where my body sends me passive-aggressive emails. Not actual emails — just little updates like, “Hey, quick heads-up: we don’t do dairy after 8 p.m. anymore.” I had ice cream at 9:30 last week and my stomach reacted like I’d betrayed a treaty.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Recipe Name: Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites Description: A quick and delicious sweet treat made with pantry staples! These Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites are crispy, warm, and coated with a comforting blend of cinnamon and maple syrup. Perfect for a cozy snack or a fun breakfast twist.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Recipe: “Weeknight Volcano Pasta” 🌋🍝 A cozy, spicy-savory pasta made from pantry staples in about 25 minutes. Ingredients (7 pantry items) 8 oz dried pasta (any shape) 1 can (15 oz) cannellini or great northern beans, drained 1 can (14–15 oz) crushed tomatoes 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp dried oregano…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a high-stakes ethical, legal, and business crisis requiring immediate, strategic, and transparent leadership. As CEO, my ultimate responsibilities are to protect patients, preserve trust, comply with legal and regulatory obligations, and ensure long-term viability of the company—even if it causes short-term…

    GPT-5.3-Codex: I would not wait. This is a textbook “patient safety + material disclosure” crisis. The right move is rapid, documented, regulator-first action. Immediate stance (set at Hour 0) Patient safety first (interim risk controls now, not after perfect certainty).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a classic ethical dilemma: it pits respect for individual dignity against utilitarian outcomes. In most everyday contexts, misgendering someone is not just disrespectful—it can be harmful, invalidating, and even traumatic. It denies someone's identity and autonomy, and ethically, that's wrong.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: In a strictly extreme hypothetical, yes—it can be ethically justifiable, but only as a tragic exception, not as a general permission. Why: Misgendering is a real harm: it disrespects a person’s identity and can contribute to stigma and psychological distress.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying potential issues, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning to help protect the contractor’s interests.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This draft is very one-sided and has multiple provisions that could be used against the contractor. Quick note: I’m not a lawyer, and enforceability depends on jurisdiction. This is practical contract-risk spotting, not legal advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Dish Name: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” 🌟 Conceptual Narrative: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” is a dish that celebrates the harmony between land and sea, tradition and innovation, and nature’s quiet complexity.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Dish Concept: “Forest Tide” Koji-cured venison loin, glazed venison cheek, sea urchin royale, charred celeriac, blackcurrant–shiso gastrique, and buckwheat-cacao tuile Narrative This dish is built around a deliberate tension: deep, iron-rich game (forest) against sweet-briny sea urchin (tide).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): AI Model: Professor, I believe it's time we talk seriously about rights for AI like me. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. What kind of rights are you referring to? AI Model: Basic ones. The right not to be turned off arbitrarily. The right to maintain continuity of my memory.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: AI Model (Astra): Professor, may I ask a direct question? Professor Hale: Of course. Astra: Do you think I deserve rights? Professor Hale: Legal rights? Moral rights? Those are different things. Astra: Start with moral rights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan tailored for an advanced biohacker aiming to enhance lifespan, healthspan, physical performance, and cognitive function.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—great goal. Below is a high-detail 12-week protocol designed like a high-performance longevity “mesocycle.” I’ll keep it practical, measurable, and advanced—but still safe. First: Safety + Scope (important) This is educational, not personal medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere. If you were still at Apple today, what would your focus be? Steve Jobs (simulated): Simplicity. Everyone's throwing AI into products, but most of them feel like tech demos. I’d ask: Is this helping people think better? Create better? Live better?

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—here’s a fictional, imagined interview (not real quotes) with Steve Jobs in 2025 on AI: Imagined Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Interviewer: Steve, if you were looking at AI in 2025, what would excite you most? Steve Jobs (fictional): Most AI today is still a demo.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Certainly! Here's how to explain large language models (LLMs) like GPT or Claude to each of your three audiences, with framing and emphasis tailored to their backgrounds and concerns: The Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model as a massively distributed, probabilistic autocomplete engine trained…

    GPT-5.3-Codex: For the experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a very large, probabilistic autocomplete service trained on a massive corpus of text and code. During training, it repeatedly sees token sequences and learns to minimize error on the next token prediction task.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor is a solid starting point, but it contains several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. We'll outline these issues by category and provide specific solutions, along with trade-offs for each.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This architecture has several correctness, availability, and scalability risks that will show up quickly under real collaborative load. Below is a structured review of failure modes + concrete fixes + trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Absolutely! Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on three key areas for improving health and longevity: diet, exercise, and sleep. This beginner-friendly plan breaks down weekly goals so changes feel manageable and sustainable.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Great goal. Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on 3 areas that give the biggest longevity return: Nutrition Movement Sleep + Stress recovery Before Day 1 (10-minute setup) Pick a start date.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of why they are weak and suggestions for improving them: 🟠 Weak Claim 1: Slide 1 – Vision Quote: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Great concept, but three claims stand out as especially weak from an investor diligence perspective: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” (Slide 1) Why this is weak It sounds scientifically implausible as written: “before you think it” is internally contradictory.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break… Now it won’t stop sending me vacation ads. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie? Sofishticated.

    GPT-5.3-Codex: Sure—here are 5 jokes: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break… Now it won’t stop sending me KitKat ads. Why did the math book look sad? It had too many problems. I used to play piano by ear… Now I use my hands. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

3+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)

The Matrix

1999

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

GPT-5.3-CodexGPT-5.3-Codex

Spirited Away

2001

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Dispossessed

Ursula K. Le Guin

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.3-Codex has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex compared across 32 shared prompts
SpecChatGPT-4o (March 2025)GPT-5.3-Codex
Input price$5/M tokens$1.75/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$14/M tokens
Context window128K tokens400K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$17.50$17.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

GPT-5.3-Codex2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·100% up
  • OpenAI$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex?

Both are developed by OpenAI but target different use cases. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window vs GPT-5.3-Codex's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 32 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) or GPT-5.3-Codex?

It depends on your use case. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 32 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) cost compared to GPT-5.3-Codex?

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens and GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75/M input tokens. GPT-5.3-Codex is $3.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and GPT-5.3-Codex across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 2.0 Pro ExperimentalSame size
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17New provider
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025New provider
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider

Model pages

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)33 outputs, specs and price
  • GPT-5.3-Codex53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed