Compare Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) by Google AI, in 4 community votes, gemini 2.5 flash preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 4 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $0.175/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is from google. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)'s 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $0.175/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). In community voting, In 4 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 4 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 4+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). In 4 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) particularly excels in Image Generation.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) uses 12.9x more bold
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

Compare Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) by Google AI, in 4 community votes, gemini 2.5 flash preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 4 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $0.175/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is from google. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)'s 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $0.175/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). In community voting, In 4 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 4 community votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 4+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking). In 4 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) particularly excels in Image Generation.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) uses 12.9x more bold
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
