Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $0/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude 3 Opus has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Mar 2024 | Jun 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic while Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is developed by NVIDIA. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3 Opus and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is $15.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3 Opus and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.