Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet, both from Anthropic, in 22 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 94% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet?
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 94% of 22 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $6/M for Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is from anthropic. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet's 200K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $6/M for Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In community voting, In 22 community votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 94% of head-to-head duels.
In 22 community votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 94% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet leads in Reasoning, Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 22+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 22 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 94% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation, Analysis.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 32.2x more headings
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.







