Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Google: Gemma 4 31B

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Google: Gemma 4 31B
66%Vocabulary57%
74wSentence Length18w
0.72Hedging0.37
0.3Bold7.1
8.9Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.24
0.06Headings0.94
0.09Transitions0.16
Based on 21 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Google: Gemma 4 31B
FAQ