Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, in 6 community votes, google: gemma 4 31b wins 80% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Google: Gemma 4 31B is the better choice overall, winning 80% of 6 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. In community voting, In 6 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 80% of head-to-head duels.
In 6 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 80% of head-to-head duels. Google: Gemma 4 31B leads in Conversation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 21× input, 38× output
Pick Google: Gemma 4 31B. In 6 blind votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 80% of the time. That's not luck.
Google: Gemma 4 31B particularly excels in Conversation. Google: Gemma 4 31B is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji
