Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
66%Vocabulary54%
74wSentence Length14w
0.72Hedging0.39
0.3Bold6.9
8.9Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.23
0.06Headings0.93
0.09Transitions0.17
Based on 21 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions