Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsCommand A+
Updated Sep 2026

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsCommand A+

Command A+ is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $0.3/M vs $6/M input tokens.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Command A+ compared across 17 shared prompts
SpecClaude 3.7 Thinking SonnetCommand A+
Input price$6/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window200K tokens192K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 17 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet1,727 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol Initial Assessment Phase (Week 0) Establish your baseline with these measurements before beginning: Blood Panel: Complete metabolic panel, lipid profile, inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL-6), hormones (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol), fasting glucose, HbA1c…
Read the full answer
Command A+2,382 words
3‑Month Biohacker Longevity Blueprint Goal: Maximize healthy lifespan, peak physical performance, and cognitive sharpness while building measurable resilience. QUICK‑START SUMMARY (ONE‑PAGE ACTION PLAN) Week Primary Focus Key Supplements (dose & timing) Fasting/Diet Exercise Wearable/HRV Stress/Neuro Lab/Tracking 1‑4…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet616 words
Collaborative Document Editor: Architecture Review Failure Modes Analysis WebSocket Connection Failures Issue: Client connections can fail due to network issues or server restarts, causing lost updates.
Read the full answer
Command A+1,674 words
This architecture, while functional for a prototype, contains several critical architectural flaws regarding consistency, availability, and scalability. Below is a breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, followed by proposed solutions and their trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet909 words
"Temporal Echo: Sea & Forest Confluence" Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the dialogue between ocean depths and ancient forest floors, creating a sensory experience where seemingly disparate ecosystems converge.
Read the full answer
Command A+1,636 words
Dish Title – “Moonlit Tide” A five‑component, multi‑textural voyage that marries the elemental forces of fire, water, earth, air and the celestial moon. The narrative follows a solitary night on the Japanese coast where the sea’s fire (charred sea urchin) meets the moon’s silver (gold leaf), the water’s whisper…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet843 words
48-Hour Action Plan: CEO Response to Drug Safety Crisis Day 1 Hours 1-3: Immediate Assessment & Response Team Assembly I'll immediately convene an emergency meeting with our internal research team, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer, and head of Pharmacovigilance to fully understand the liver failure…
Read the full answer
Command A+1,034 words
48-HOUR CRISIS ACTION PLAN: ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT HOURS 0-1: IMMEDIATE ASSESSMENT & CRISIS TEAM ACTIVATION Actions: Activate Crisis Management Team (CMT): CEO, Legal Counsel, Medical Director, Head of Regulatory Affairs, Head of PR, CFO, Head of HR Secure all data related to liver failure cases…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet755 words
The Transistor in 1920: An Alternate Technological Timeline Early Development (1920-1939) Initial Phase (1920-1929) If invented in 1920, transistors would initially be a laboratory curiosity.
Read the full answer
Command A+2,523 words
A 1920 Transistor: The Ripple Effects Through 1980 The Early Spark – 1920s‑30s What would change? Solid‑state amplifiers appear a quarter‑century earlier. The first practical transistor (likely a point‑contact or junction type) would be patented by the early 1930s, giving radio receivers a tiny, low‑power, reliable…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet374 words
Analysis: The 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch Deck "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim makes a scientifically impossible promise.
Read the full answer
Command A+1,005 words
Three weakest claims in the deck (with why they’re weak and how to fix them) “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy – works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Command A+
Command A+

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Command A+ costs 20x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Command A+
Input
$0.30
20× cheaper
Output
$1.50
20× cheaper

Command A+ is cheaper on both: 20× input, 20× output.

Where to run it

1 host

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Command A+1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Cohere$0.30 in·$1.50 out·192k·99.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Command A+ is developed by Cohere. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Command A+'s 192K. You can compare their actual outputs across 17 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Command A+ each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 17 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Command A+ costs $0.3/M input tokens. Command A+ is $5.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Command A+ across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Command A+ logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Command A+ logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Command A+ logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Command A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Command A+ logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Command A+ vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude 3.7 Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 SonnetVersion compare
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Command A+ logoNorth Mini Code logo
Command A+ vs North Mini CodeSame lab
Command A+ logoOx Alpha logo
Command A+ vs Ox AlphaSame size
Command A+ logoGLM 4.5 Air logo
Command A+ vs GLM 4.5 AirSame size
Command A+ logoGLM 4.6 logo
Command A+ vs GLM 4.6New provider
Command A+ logoGLM 4.7 logo
Command A+ vs GLM 4.7Same size
Command A+ logoGLM 4.7 Flash logo
Command A+ vs GLM 4.7 FlashNew provider

Model pages

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet59 outputs, specs and price
Command A+ logo
Command A+17 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed