Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI, in 4 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 500K, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 4 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Image Generation. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 60x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
24× cheaper
Output
$0.50
60× cheaper
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 24× input, 60× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
44%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 54.1x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
61%Vocabulary54%
49wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.64
2.2Bold3.8
4.5Lists2.4
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.03
0.21Transitions0.30
Based on 21 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
