Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsGrok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $1.6/M vs $6/M input tokens.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Grok 4.7 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecClaude 3.7 Thinking SonnetGrok 4.7
Input price$6/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window200K tokens500K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet632 words
How Large Language Models Work: Three Tailored Explanations For an Experienced Software Engineer What makes LLMs fascinating from a systems perspective is that they're essentially massive distributed computing graphs that learn to compress and reconstitute information through backpropagation.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet616 words
Collaborative Document Editor: Architecture Review Failure Modes Analysis WebSocket Connection Failures Issue: Client connections can fail due to network issues or server restarts, causing lost updates.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet374 words
Analysis: The 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch Deck "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim makes a scientifically impossible promise.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Grok 4.7 costs 6.3x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
3.8× cheaper
Output
$4.80
6.3× cheaper

Grok 4.7 is cheaper on both: 3.8× input, 6.3× output.

Where to run it

1 host

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens. Grok 4.7 is $4.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoHy3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoGLM 5.3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude 3.7 Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 SonnetVersion compare
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoQwen3.6 Max Preview logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.6 Plus Preview (free) logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.6 Plus Preview (free)Same size
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame size
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoQwen3.7 Max logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3.7 MaxNew provider

Model pages

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet59 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed