Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsLaguna XS 2.1 (free)
Updated Jul 2026

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsLaguna XS 2.1 (free)

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $0/M vs $6/M input tokens.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Laguna XS 2.1 (free) compared across 11 shared prompts
SpecClaude 3.7 Thinking SonnetLaguna XS 2.1 (free)
Input price$6/M tokensFree
Output price$30/M tokensFree
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 11 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet1,727 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol Initial Assessment Phase (Week 0) Establish your baseline with these measurements before beginning: Blood Panel: Complete metabolic panel, lipid profile, inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL-6), hormones (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol), fasting glucose, HbA1c…
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)828 words
3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for a Biohacker Designed for advanced biohackers with a focus on longevity, cognitive sharpness, and peak physical performance. Assumes access to basic medical testing, wearables, and some advanced tools (e.g., neurofeedback apps).
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet632 words
How Large Language Models Work: Three Tailored Explanations For an Experienced Software Engineer What makes LLMs fascinating from a systems perspective is that they're essentially massive distributed computing graphs that learn to compress and reconstitute information through backpropagation.
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)610 words
For the Software Engineer Think of training a language model like building a distributed prediction system with an incredibly complex API contract. Instead of training on labeled datasets where you explicitly tell it "this text is sentiment-positive," you're feeding it massive amounts of text and asking it to predict…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet909 words
"Temporal Echo: Sea & Forest Confluence" Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the dialogue between ocean depths and ancient forest floors, creating a sensory experience where seemingly disparate ecosystems converge.
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)602 words
Recipe: "Nocturne of Shadows and Light" Concept: A poetic exploration of ancient flavors (pomegranate, quince) intertwined with modernist techniques (spherification, sous vide) and an unexpected coffee-cocoa depth, harmonizing the boldness of game with the elegance of fruit.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet760 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT RANGE: $48-$66 (Base/Bull) Thesis: LedgerLift's market-leading spend management platform demonstrates exceptional unit economics with 123% NRR and 18-month CAC payback, positioning it to capture significant share in the underpenetrated mid-market…
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)877 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long/Short/Comps Analysis Date: [Insert Date] Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $85–$105 Thesis: LedgerLift is executing on a best-in-class B2B SaaS spend management platform with high net revenue retention (NRR), strong gross margins, and a rapidly…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet755 words
The Transistor in 1920: An Alternate Technological Timeline Early Development (1920-1939) Initial Phase (1920-1929) If invented in 1920, transistors would initially be a laboratory curiosity.
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)870 words
The Transistor Revolution: A 1920 Timeline Analysis Immediate Impact (1920-1940) Early Military Applications With transistors available 27 years before radar, telecommunications would see revolutionary improvements: Radio warfare: Nations could develop sophisticated radio direction-finding and jamming capabilities by…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet712 words
Analysis of Problematic Contract Clauses This software consulting agreement contains numerous unbalanced provisions that heavily favor the client at the contractor's expense. Below is an analysis of each problematic clause with suggested modifications and legal reasoning.
Read the full answer
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)635 words
I'll analyze each clause in this software consulting agreement to identify potential risks to the contractor and suggest modifications with legal reasoning. Clause-by-Clause Analysis Clause 1: SCOPE Risk: Unlimited scope creep without additional compensation Modification: Add: "Any modification to the scope requiring…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

1 host

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
PPoolsidefp8$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Laguna XS 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 11 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Laguna XS 2.1 (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 11 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Laguna XS 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Laguna XS 2.1 (free) is $6.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Laguna XS 2.1 (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoHy3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoGLM 5.3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude 3.7 Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 SonnetVersion compare
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoLaguna S 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)Same lab
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoNova Premier 1.0 logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Nova Premier 1.0Same size
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoo1 logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs o1New provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoOpenAI o3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs OpenAI o3New provider
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoo3 Mini logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs o3 MiniNew provider

Model pages

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet59 outputs, specs and price
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)11 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed