Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs o1
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against o1 by OpenAI, in 6 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
o1Runner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 6 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
2.5× cheaper
Output
$30.00
2.0× cheaper
o1
Input
$15.00
Output
$60.00
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is cheaper on both — 2.5× input, 2.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
53%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 4.1x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
o1
61%Vocabulary64%
49wSentence Length16w
0.64Hedging0.76
2.2Bold5.0
4.5Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.44
0.21Transitions0.40
Based on 21 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
