Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu, context windows of 200K vs 123K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.28/M for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B. Context windows: 200K vs 123K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is from baidu. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B's 123K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.28/M for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 11× input, 14× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu, context windows of 200K vs 123K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.28/M for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B. Context windows: 200K vs 123K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is from baidu. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B's 123K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.28/M for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 11× input, 14× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji