Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google AI, in 1 community votes, gemini 3.1 pro preview wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2/M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2/M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. In 1 blind votes, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
97%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview uses 4.0x more bold
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length18w
0.99Hedging0.29
1.2Bold4.9
4.3Lists3.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.72
0.23Transitions0.14
Based on 13 + 23 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ