Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 3.5 Flash by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.5 Flash are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Gemini 3.5 Flash is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 3.5 Flash's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 1.7× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 6.3x more hedging
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 3.5 Flash by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.5 Flash are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Gemini 3.5 Flash is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 3.5 Flash's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 1.7× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 3.5 Flash has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 6.3x more hedging