Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI, in 6 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet and gpt-3.5 turbo are closely matched, context windows of 200K vs 16K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-3.5 Turbo?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-3.5 Turbo are closely matched based on 6 community votes. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo. Context windows: 200K vs 16K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-3.5 Turbo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-3.5 Turbo is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo. In community voting, In 6 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-3.5 Turbo are closely matched.
In 6 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-3.5 Turbo are closely matched. GPT-3.5 Turbo leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 7.5× output
Votes are tied. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.
GPT-3.5 Turbo particularly excels in Image Generation. GPT-3.5 Turbo is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 121.0x more bold
