Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 Mini
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4.1 Mini by OpenAI, in 1 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4.1 Mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini. Context windows: 200K vs 1048K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 Mini
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4.1 Mini is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4.1 Mini's 1048K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 SonnetWinner
GPT-4.1 MiniRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet. In 1 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-4.1 Mini is 9.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
GPT-4.1 Mini uses 3.9x more bold
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4.1 Mini
62%Vocabulary59%
35wSentence Length19w
0.99Hedging0.46
1.2Bold4.7
4.3Lists4.9
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.76
0.23Transitions0.17
Based on 13 + 23 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
FAQ