Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4.1 Mini by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 Mini are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini. Context windows: 200K vs 1048K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4.1 Mini is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4.1 Mini's 1048K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini.
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on both — 7.5× input, 9.4× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT-4.1 Mini is 9.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-4.1 Mini uses 3.9x more bold
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4.1 Mini by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 Mini are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini. Context windows: 200K vs 1048K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-4.1 Mini is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4.1 Mini's 1048K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for GPT-4.1 Mini.
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on both — 7.5× input, 9.4× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT-4.1 Mini is 9.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GPT-4.1 Mini uses 3.9x more bold