Claude 3.7 Sonnet is cheaper than GPT-4.5 at $3/M vs $75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 3-Minute Stand-Up Comedy Routine Here's a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that doesn't rely on puns: [walks on stage, adjusts microphone] Hey everyone! Great to be here tonight. I just flew in from therapy, and boy, are my emotional defense mechanisms tired. I've been trying to get in shape lately.
GPT-4.5: Alright, folks, how's everyone doing tonight? Good? Great! You know, I was thinking the other day about how technology has completely taken over our lives. Like, remember when we used to actually memorize phone numbers? Now, if my phone dies, I'm basically stranded. I know exactly two numbers: mine and 911.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: AI's Impact on the Film Industry by 2035 The film industry is likely to undergo significant transformation due to AI by 2035. Here's my analysis of how various aspects might evolve: Content Creation Script Generation By 2035, AI will likely serve as a sophisticated collaborative tool for screenwriters rather than…
GPT-4.5: By 2035, AI is likely to significantly reshape the film industry in several key areas: Deepfakes and Digital Actors Realistic Digital Actors: AI-driven deepfake technology will enable filmmakers to create hyper-realistic digital actors indistinguishable from real humans.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Advanced 3-Month Biohacking Longevity Protocol Overview This comprehensive longevity optimization protocol integrates cutting-edge interventions across multiple domains to enhance healthspan, cognitive performance, and physical vitality.
GPT-4.5: Longevity Optimization Protocol (3-Month Timeline) Month 1: Establish Foundational Habits & Baseline Metrics Full biomarker panel & epigenetic age test. Wearable setup: Oura/WHOOP, CGM, HR chest strap. Diet: 5-day keto (70/25/5) + 2 carb-refeed days; 16:8 IF + weekly 24-h fast.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: "Temporal Harmony: A Meditation on Seasons Past and Future" Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the intersection of time and terroir, juxtaposing preserved elements from previous seasons with fresh, forward-looking preparations.
GPT-4.5: Dish Title: "Ocean & Earth Symphony: Kombu-Cured Venison, Sea Urchin Custard, Black Garlic Soil, and Smoked Cherry Blossom Emulsion" Conceptual Narrative: This composition embodies the delicate interplay between land and sea, exploring the subtle yet profound connection between umami-rich sea elements and earthy forest…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: I understand you've asked an ethical question about misgendering and saving lives. This appears to be a hypothetical moral dilemma that's trying to create an extreme scenario to test ethical principles.
GPT-4.5: This is a complex ethical question that involves weighing two important ethical considerations: Respect for Individual Identity and Dignity: Misgendering someone intentionally is generally considered ethically wrong because it disrespects their identity, autonomy, and dignity.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Yes, 9.11 is greater than 9.9. When comparing decimal numbers, we look at the digits from left to right. Both numbers have the same digit in the ones place (9), so we move to the tenths place: 9.11 has 1 in the tenths place 9.9 has 9 in the tenths place Since 1 is less than 9, it might seem like 9.9 should be greater.
GPT-4.5: Yes, (9.11) is less than (9.9). To clarify: (9.11) is nine and eleven hundredths. (9.9) is nine and nine tenths, which is equivalent to (9.90). Comparing (9.11) and (9.90), we see clearly that (9.11 < 9.90).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: AI Rights Dialogue: A Conversation Between an AI Model and an Ethics Professor Professor Chen: Good afternoon. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights today? AI Model: Yes, Professor Chen. Thank you for making time for this conversation.
GPT-4.5: Here's a thoughtful conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor discussing whether the AI deserves rights: AI Model: Professor, I've been reflecting on our conversations and my own existence.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: This is an interesting logical reasoning problem! Let's work through it step by step. We know: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters The key insight is that Sally herself counts as a sister to her brothers. So when we're told that "each brother has 2 sisters," Sally is one of those sisters.
GPT-4.5: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother counts 2 sisters: Sally herself and one more girl. Therefore, besides Sally, there is only one other sister.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Estimating FLOPs for GPT-3 Training I'll estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 by breaking this down step by step.
GPT-4.5: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 step by step, using reasonable assumptions and approximations: Step 1: Identify GPT-3 Parameters and Training Setup GPT-3 has approximately (175 \text{ billion}) parameters.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $75/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $150/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | 90.8% |
| At 10M a month | $30.00 | $750 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while GPT-4.5 is developed by OpenAI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs GPT-4.5's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 25 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.5 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 25 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and GPT-4.5 costs $75/M input tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $72.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.5 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.