Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5 Pro
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-5 Pro by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 400K, tested across 42 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5 Pro?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5 Pro are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $15/M for GPT-5 Pro. Context windows: 200K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while GPT-5 Pro is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-5 Pro's 400K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $15/M for GPT-5 Pro.
Our Verdict
GPT-5 Pro
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5 Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 8.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
91%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 121.0x more bold
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-5 Pro
62%Vocabulary65%
35wSentence Length15w
0.99Hedging0.32
1.2Bold0.0
4.3Lists2.9
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.00
0.23Transitions0.01
Based on 13 + 11 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ