Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 66K, tested across 24 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 200K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

Ask them anything

FAQ