Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 200K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 20× input, 10× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
